OPGSX vs. FTHNX
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX).
OPGSX is managed by Invesco. It was launched on Jul 18, 1983. FTHNX is managed by Fuller & Thaler Asset Mgmt. It was launched on Sep 8, 2011.
Performance
OPGSX vs. FTHNX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
OPGSX vs. FTHNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OPGSX Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund | 6.89% | 131.03% | 13.05% | 6.35% | -16.86% | -2.75% | 36.15% | 46.37% | -13.15% | 17.17% |
FTHNX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund | 0.58% | 11.69% | 15.81% | 22.18% | -7.73% | 30.44% | 10.05% | 27.74% | -13.45% | 17.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, OPGSX achieves a 6.89% return, which is significantly higher than FTHNX's 0.58% return. Over the past 10 years, OPGSX has outperformed FTHNX with an annualized return of 18.10%, while FTHNX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.10% annualized return.
OPGSX
- 1D
- 6.42%
- 1M
- -19.81%
- YTD
- 6.89%
- 6M
- 19.86%
- 1Y
- 93.74%
- 3Y*
- 39.06%
- 5Y*
- 20.64%
- 10Y*
- 18.10%
FTHNX
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -5.62%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 19.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.26%
- 5Y*
- 9.50%
- 10Y*
- 13.10%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
OPGSX vs. FTHNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
OPGSX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FTHNX's 1.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
OPGSX vs. FTHNX — Risk / Return Rank
OPGSX
FTHNX
OPGSX vs. FTHNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX) and Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| OPGSX | FTHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.49 | 1.06 | +1.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.77 | 1.63 | +1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.21 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.94 | 1.72 | +2.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.50 | 6.65 | +8.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| OPGSX | FTHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 1.06 | +1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 | 0.50 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.65 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.61 | -0.36 |
Correlation
The correlation between OPGSX and FTHNX is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
OPGSX vs. FTHNX - Dividend Comparison
OPGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, more than FTHNX's 0.28% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OPGSX Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund | 0.40% | 0.43% | 0.86% | 0.81% | 0.45% | 3.56% | 1.55% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 2.78% | 7.21% | 0.00% |
FTHNX Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund | 0.28% | 0.28% | 7.84% | 1.60% | 0.95% | 3.55% | 0.11% | 0.11% | 0.21% | 0.09% | 0.00% | 15.47% |
Drawdowns
OPGSX vs. FTHNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum OPGSX drawdown since its inception was -80.04%, which is greater than FTHNX's maximum drawdown of -37.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for OPGSX and FTHNX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| OPGSX | FTHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.04% | -37.78% | -42.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.01% | -12.40% | -16.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.09% | -24.63% | -22.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.09% | -37.78% | -9.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.81% | -7.24% | -12.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.33% | -5.77% | -23.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.38% | 3.21% | +4.17% |
Volatility
OPGSX vs. FTHNX - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Gold & Special Minerals Fund (OPGSX) has a higher volatility of 16.75% compared to Fuller & Thaler Behavioral Small-Cap Equity Fund (FTHNX) at 5.74%. This indicates that OPGSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| OPGSX | FTHNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.75% | 5.74% | +11.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.48% | 10.90% | +24.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.40% | 19.72% | +23.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.09% | 18.93% | +14.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.99% | 20.10% | +12.89% |