RMQHX vs. UDPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Ultra Dow 30 ProFund (UDPIX).
RMQHX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100. It was launched on Nov 28, 2014. UDPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 2, 2002.
Performance
RMQHX vs. UDPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMQHX vs. UDPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | -12.99% | 33.90% | 44.74% | 115.89% | -59.96% | 56.33% | 101.06% | 80.70% | -7.28% | 69.79% |
UDPIX ProFunds Ultra Dow 30 ProFund | -8.21% | 19.96% | 18.13% | 23.94% | -19.89% | 52.21% | 15.74% | 47.47% | -13.82% | 54.86% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a -12.99% return, which is significantly lower than UDPIX's -8.21% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed UDPIX with an annualized return of 31.05%, while UDPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 18.77% annualized return.
RMQHX
- 1D
- 7.46%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- -12.99%
- 6M
- -11.17%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- 37.08%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 31.05%
UDPIX
- 1D
- 4.95%
- 1M
- -10.65%
- YTD
- -8.21%
- 6M
- -2.75%
- 1Y
- 14.80%
- 3Y*
- 17.38%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- 18.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMQHX vs. UDPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than UDPIX's 1.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMQHX vs. UDPIX — Risk / Return Rank
RMQHX
UDPIX
RMQHX vs. UDPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Ultra Dow 30 ProFund (UDPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMQHX | UDPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 0.44 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 0.86 | +0.68 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.12 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 0.81 | +0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 2.79 | +2.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMQHX | UDPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.44 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.37 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.54 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.31 | +0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMQHX and UDPIX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RMQHX vs. UDPIX - Dividend Comparison
RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.96%, more than UDPIX's 4.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | 39.96% | 34.77% | 25.22% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 5.17% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UDPIX ProFunds Ultra Dow 30 ProFund | 4.25% | 3.90% | 0.00% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 13.43% | 14.53% | 1.96% | 0.93% | 0.02% |
Drawdowns
RMQHX vs. UDPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, smaller than the maximum UDPIX drawdown of -81.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and UDPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMQHX | UDPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -81.97% | +18.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.11% | -20.97% | -4.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.21% | -40.44% | -22.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -63.40% | +0.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.37% | -15.22% | -4.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -17.66% | +4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | 6.07% | +1.24% |
Volatility
RMQHX vs. UDPIX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to ProFunds Ultra Dow 30 ProFund (UDPIX) at 9.85%. This indicates that RMQHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UDPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMQHX | UDPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.71% | 9.85% | +3.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | 18.53% | +7.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.80% | 33.63% | +14.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.30% | 29.91% | +16.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.36% | 35.08% | +11.28% |