RMQHX vs. SIHAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and Guggenheim High Yield Fund (SIHAX).
RMQHX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100. It was launched on Nov 28, 2014. SIHAX is managed by Guggenheim. It was launched on Aug 5, 1996.
Performance
RMQHX vs. SIHAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMQHX vs. SIHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | -12.99% | 33.90% | 44.74% | 115.89% | -59.96% | 56.33% | 101.06% | 80.70% | -7.28% | 69.79% |
SIHAX Guggenheim High Yield Fund | -1.76% | 6.84% | 6.93% | 10.74% | -10.51% | 4.36% | 4.55% | 11.26% | -3.17% | 6.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a -12.99% return, which is significantly lower than SIHAX's -1.76% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed SIHAX with an annualized return of 31.05%, while SIHAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.84% annualized return.
RMQHX
- 1D
- 7.46%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- -12.99%
- 6M
- -11.17%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- 37.08%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 31.05%
SIHAX
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- YTD
- -1.76%
- 6M
- -0.57%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- 6.42%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- 4.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMQHX vs. SIHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than SIHAX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMQHX vs. SIHAX — Risk / Return Rank
RMQHX
SIHAX
RMQHX vs. SIHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and Guggenheim High Yield Fund (SIHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMQHX | SIHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 1.32 | -0.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 1.96 | -0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.29 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.61 | +0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 6.54 | -0.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMQHX | SIHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 1.32 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.71 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 1.06 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 1.28 | -0.63 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMQHX and SIHAX is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RMQHX vs. SIHAX - Dividend Comparison
RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.96%, more than SIHAX's 5.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | 39.96% | 34.77% | 25.22% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 5.17% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIHAX Guggenheim High Yield Fund | 5.97% | 6.39% | 5.45% | 4.91% | 4.75% | 3.70% | 4.79% | 5.44% | 6.86% | 5.53% | 6.09% | 7.53% |
Drawdowns
RMQHX vs. SIHAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, which is greater than SIHAX's maximum drawdown of -36.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and SIHAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMQHX | SIHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -36.72% | -26.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.11% | -2.86% | -22.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.21% | -13.95% | -49.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -19.31% | -43.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.37% | -2.16% | -17.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -2.64% | -10.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | 0.71% | +6.60% |
Volatility
RMQHX vs. SIHAX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to Guggenheim High Yield Fund (SIHAX) at 1.42%. This indicates that RMQHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMQHX | SIHAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.71% | 1.42% | +12.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | 2.20% | +24.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.80% | 3.44% | +44.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.30% | 4.33% | +41.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.36% | 4.59% | +41.77% |