PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMQHX vs. SECEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMQHX vs. SECEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund (SECEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly higher than SECEX's 10.66% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed SECEX with an annualized return of 34.05%, while SECEX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.96% annualized return.


RMQHX

1D
1.29%
1M
-7.73%
6M
13.82%
YTD
17.70%
1Y
41.24%
3Y*
36.07%
5Y*
18.24%
10Y*
34.05%
ALL TIME*
31.71%

SECEX

1D
0.39%
1M
-0.96%
6M
9.44%
YTD
10.66%
1Y
22.70%
3Y*
19.37%
5Y*
11.64%
10Y*
13.96%
ALL TIME*
5.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

RMQHX vs. SECEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMQHX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H
17.70%33.90%44.74%115.89%-59.96%56.33%101.06%80.70%-7.28%69.79%
SECEX
Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund
10.66%16.04%25.74%26.72%-21.98%28.21%17.76%29.62%-7.18%21.99%

Correlation

The correlation between RMQHX and SECEX is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.90

The correlation between RMQHX and SECEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMQHX vs. SECEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RMQHX
RMQHX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
RMQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
RMQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SECEX
SECEX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
SECEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SECEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
SECEX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SECEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
SECEX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RMQHX vs. SECEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund (SECEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RMQHXSECEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.26

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

2.03

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.41

8.09

-3.67

RMQHX vs. SECEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMQHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the SECEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMQHX and SECEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMQHX vs. SECEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, smaller than the maximum SECEX drawdown of -73.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and SECEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMQHXSECEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.21%

-73.88%

+10.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.97%

-10.23%

-14.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.46%

-18.34%

-24.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.21%

-27.55%

-35.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.21%

-35.59%

-27.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.01%

-3.60%

-12.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.81%

-20.60%

+7.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.11%

2.56%

+5.55%

Volatility

RMQHX vs. SECEX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a higher volatility of 14.50% compared to Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund (SECEX) at 4.41%. This indicates that RMQHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SECEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMQHXSECEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.50%

4.41%

+10.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.55%

11.79%

+20.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.25%

14.23%

+25.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.26%

17.29%

+29.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.84%

18.19%

+28.65%

RMQHX vs. SECEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than SECEX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMQHX vs. SECEX - Dividend Comparison

RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.54%, more than SECEX's 2.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RMQHX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H
29.54%34.77%25.22%3.66%0.00%2.13%5.17%0.10%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SECEX
Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund
2.67%2.95%23.10%2.50%40.57%4.58%9.21%1.57%22.52%18.80%1.94%12.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, RMQHX and SECEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RMQHX has higher volatility (14.50%) compared to SECEX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMQHX dropped -63.21% vs SECEX's -73.88%.

SECEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMQHX and SECEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer