RMQHX vs. IDPIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Industrial Ultra Sector Fund (IDPIX).
RMQHX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100. It was launched on Nov 28, 2014. IDPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jan 29, 2004.
Performance
RMQHX vs. IDPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMQHX vs. IDPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | -12.99% | 33.90% | 44.74% | 115.89% | -59.96% | 56.33% | 101.06% | 80.70% | -7.28% | 69.79% |
IDPIX ProFunds Industrial Ultra Sector Fund | 5.48% | 22.76% | 16.21% | 21.47% | -24.36% | 25.42% | 18.08% | 46.48% | -20.05% | 29.39% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a -12.99% return, which is significantly lower than IDPIX's 5.48% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed IDPIX with an annualized return of 31.05%, while IDPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.90% annualized return.
RMQHX
- 1D
- 7.46%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- -12.99%
- 6M
- -11.17%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- 37.08%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 31.05%
IDPIX
- 1D
- 4.88%
- 1M
- -14.15%
- YTD
- 5.48%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 30.52%
- 3Y*
- 20.70%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 13.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMQHX vs. IDPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than IDPIX's 1.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMQHX vs. IDPIX — Risk / Return Rank
RMQHX
IDPIX
RMQHX vs. IDPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and ProFunds Industrial Ultra Sector Fund (IDPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMQHX | IDPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 1.09 | -0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | 1.62 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | 1.78 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | 6.74 | -1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMQHX | IDPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 1.09 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.33 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.47 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.34 | +0.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMQHX and IDPIX is 0.70, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RMQHX vs. IDPIX - Dividend Comparison
RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.96%, more than IDPIX's 1.67% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | 39.96% | 34.77% | 25.22% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 5.17% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDPIX ProFunds Industrial Ultra Sector Fund | 1.67% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.62% |
Drawdowns
RMQHX vs. IDPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, smaller than the maximum IDPIX drawdown of -79.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and IDPIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMQHX | IDPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -79.54% | +16.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.11% | -18.50% | -6.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.21% | -37.93% | -25.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -55.09% | -8.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.37% | -14.15% | -5.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -15.04% | +2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | 4.89% | +2.42% |
Volatility
RMQHX vs. IDPIX - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to ProFunds Industrial Ultra Sector Fund (IDPIX) at 9.68%. This indicates that RMQHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMQHX | IDPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.71% | 9.68% | +4.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | 17.51% | +8.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.80% | 29.19% | +18.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.30% | 26.65% | +19.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.36% | 29.59% | +16.77% |