RMQHX vs. GOF

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

RMQHX (Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H) and GOF (Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund) are both mutual funds - RMQHX is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100, while GOF is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Guggenheim. RMQHX is passively managed, while GOF is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX returned 34.05%/yr vs 7.06%/yr for GOF. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RMQHX charges 1.27%/yr vs 1.89%/yr for GOF.

Performance

RMQHX vs. GOF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a 17.70% return, which is significantly higher than GOF's -9.05% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed GOF with an annualized return of 34.05%, while GOF has yielded a comparatively lower 7.06% annualized return.

RMQHX

• 1D: 1.29%
• 1M: -7.73%
• 6M: 13.82%
• YTD: 17.70%
• 1Y: 41.24%
• 3Y*: 36.07%
• 5Y*: 18.24%
• 10Y*: 34.05%
• ALL TIME*: 31.71%

GOF

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: -2.92%
• 6M: -6.47%
• YTD: -9.05%
• 1Y: -15.70%
• 3Y*: 1.75%
• 5Y*: -0.24%
• 10Y*: 7.06%
• ALL TIME*: 8.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund	$13.30M	$14.34M	$15.54M
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

RMQHX vs. GOF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H	17.70%	33.90%	44.74%	115.89%	-59.96%	56.33%	101.06%	80.70%	-7.28%	69.79%
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund	-9.05%	-1.92%	38.04%	-3.04%	-5.78%	4.90%	21.51%	10.51%	-5.95%	22.01%

Correlation

The correlation between RMQHX and GOF is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.34
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.38
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015	0.32

Return for Risk

RMQHX vs. GOF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RMQHX

RMQHX Risk / Return Rank: 27
RMQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
RMQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
RMQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
RMQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
RMQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 28

GOF

GOF Risk / Return Rank: 0
GOF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
GOF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
GOF Omega Ratio Rank: 0
GOF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
GOF Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RMQHX vs. GOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RMQHX	GOF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	-0.86	+1.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	-1.03	+2.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	0.84	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	-0.68	+2.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.41	-1.11	+5.52

RMQHX vs. GOF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMQHX Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the GOF Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMQHX and GOF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RMQHX vs. GOF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, which is greater than GOF's maximum drawdown of -54.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and GOF.

Drawdown Indicators

	RMQHX	GOF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.21%	-54.66%	-8.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.97%	-23.24%	-1.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.46%	-28.56%	-13.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.21%	-32.41%	-30.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.21%	-38.50%	-24.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.01%	-18.98%	+2.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.81%	-7.15%	-5.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.11%	14.19%	-6.08%

Volatility

RMQHX vs. GOF - Volatility Comparison

Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a higher volatility of 14.50% compared to Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) at 2.59%. This indicates that RMQHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RMQHX	GOF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.50%	2.59%	+11.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.55%	10.60%	+21.95%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.25%	18.26%	+20.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.26%	18.18%	+29.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.84%	19.54%	+27.30%

RMQHX vs. GOF - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than GOF's 1.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

RMQHX vs. GOF - Dividend Comparison

RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 29.54%, more than GOF's 20.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund	20.83%	16.97%	14.32%	17.07%	14.36%	11.93%	11.26%	12.08%	11.96%	10.13%	11.13%	12.98%
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H	29.54%	34.77%	25.22%	3.66%	0.00%	2.13%	5.17%	0.10%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RMQHX and GOF in my portfolio?

RMQHX and GOF have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RMQHX or GOF?

RMQHX has higher volatility (14.50%) compared to GOF (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMQHX dropped -63.21% vs GOF's -54.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RMQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.