RMQHX vs. GOF
Compare and contrast key facts about Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF).
RMQHX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100. It was launched on Nov 28, 2014. GOF is an actively managed fund by Guggenheim. It was launched on Jul 26, 2007.
Performance
RMQHX vs. GOF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMQHX vs. GOF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | -12.99% | 33.90% | 44.74% | 115.89% | -59.96% | 56.33% | 101.06% | 80.70% | -7.28% | 69.79% |
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | -9.04% | -1.92% | 38.04% | -3.04% | -5.78% | 4.90% | 21.51% | 10.51% | -5.95% | 22.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a -12.99% return, which is significantly lower than GOF's -9.04% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed GOF with an annualized return of 31.05%, while GOF has yielded a comparatively lower 8.53% annualized return.
RMQHX
- 1D
- 7.46%
- 1M
- -10.36%
- YTD
- -12.99%
- 6M
- -11.17%
- 1Y
- 39.17%
- 3Y*
- 37.08%
- 5Y*
- 16.36%
- 10Y*
- 31.05%
GOF
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- -4.58%
- YTD
- -9.04%
- 6M
- -18.98%
- 1Y
- -15.21%
- 3Y*
- 2.84%
- 5Y*
- 1.09%
- 10Y*
- 8.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMQHX vs. GOF - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than GOF's 1.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMQHX vs. GOF — Risk / Return Rank
RMQHX
GOF
RMQHX vs. GOF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMQHX | GOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | -0.72 | +1.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.54 | -0.80 | +2.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.86 | +0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.64 | -0.67 | +2.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.65 | -1.50 | +7.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMQHX | GOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | -0.72 | +1.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.06 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.44 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.41 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMQHX and GOF is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RMQHX vs. GOF - Dividend Comparison
RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.96%, more than GOF's 19.51% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | 39.96% | 34.77% | 25.22% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 5.17% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GOF Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund | 19.51% | 16.97% | 14.32% | 17.07% | 14.36% | 11.93% | 11.26% | 12.08% | 11.96% | 10.13% | 11.13% | 12.98% |
Drawdowns
RMQHX vs. GOF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, which is greater than GOF's maximum drawdown of -54.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and GOF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMQHX | GOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -54.66% | -8.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.11% | -23.24% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.21% | -32.41% | -30.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.21% | -38.50% | -24.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.37% | -18.98% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.01% | -6.97% | -6.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.31% | 10.38% | -3.07% |
Volatility
RMQHX vs. GOF - Volatility Comparison
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a higher volatility of 13.71% compared to Guggenheim Strategic Opportunities Fund (GOF) at 6.62%. This indicates that RMQHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMQHX | GOF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.71% | 6.62% | +7.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.24% | 16.97% | +9.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.80% | 21.15% | +26.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.30% | 18.72% | +27.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.36% | 19.48% | +26.88% |