PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMQHX vs. DXQLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RMQHX vs. DXQLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMQHX achieves a 40.14% return, which is significantly higher than DXQLX's 35.36% return. Over the past 10 years, RMQHX has outperformed DXQLX with an annualized return of 37.59%, while DXQLX has yielded a comparatively lower 35.37% annualized return.


RMQHX

1D
0.94%
1M
21.45%
YTD
40.14%
6M
35.68%
1Y
83.42%
3Y*
51.16%
5Y*
27.31%
10Y*
37.59%

DXQLX

1D
0.81%
1M
18.74%
YTD
35.36%
6M
31.80%
1Y
71.91%
3Y*
44.83%
5Y*
23.91%
10Y*
35.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMQHX vs. DXQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMQHX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H
40.14%33.90%44.74%115.89%-59.96%56.33%101.06%80.70%-7.28%69.79%
DXQLX
Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund
35.36%29.99%39.26%97.59%-57.72%55.98%100.94%79.36%-81.54%743.06%

Correlation

The correlation between RMQHX and DXQLX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.99

The correlation between RMQHX and DXQLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMQHX vs. DXQLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMQHX
RMQHX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RMQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
RMQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

DXQLX
DXQLX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
DXQLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXQLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXQLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
DXQLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXQLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMQHX vs. DXQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMQHXDXQLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

3.41

+0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.56

12.47

+0.09

RMQHX vs. DXQLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMQHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the DXQLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMQHX and DXQLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMQHXDXQLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

2.66

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.57

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.26

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.11

+0.64

Drawdowns

RMQHX vs. DXQLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMQHX drawdown since its inception was -63.21%, smaller than the maximum DXQLX drawdown of -96.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMQHX and DXQLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMQHXDXQLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.21%

-96.04%

+32.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.97%

-21.88%

-3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.46%

-37.99%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.21%

-60.79%

-2.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.21%

-87.23%

+24.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.87%

-51.61%

+38.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.89%

5.97%

+0.92%

Volatility

RMQHX vs. DXQLX - Volatility Comparison

Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a higher volatility of 8.58% compared to Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX) at 7.58%. This indicates that RMQHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXQLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMQHXDXQLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.58%

7.58%

+1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.32%

21.24%

+3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.15%

28.08%

+4.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.22%

42.14%

+4.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.44%

138.65%

-92.21%

RMQHX vs. DXQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMQHX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than DXQLX's 1.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

RMQHX vs. DXQLX - Dividend Comparison

RMQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.81%, more than DXQLX's 10.93% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DXQLX
Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund
10.93%14.50%0.33%0.00%0.00%11.75%10.90%3.37%7.37%5.72%
RMQHX
Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H
24.81%34.77%25.22%3.66%0.00%2.13%5.17%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, RMQHX and DXQLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RMQHX has higher volatility (8.58%) compared to DXQLX (7.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMQHX dropped -63.21% vs DXQLX's -96.04%.

RMQHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMQHX and DXQLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer