RMOP vs. JMHI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RMOP (Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF) and JMHI (JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF) are both High Yield Muni funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RMOP returned 10.23% vs 6.41% for JMHI. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RMOP charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JMHI.

Performance

RMOP vs. JMHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP) and JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMOP achieves a 3.38% return, which is significantly higher than JMHI's 1.55% return.

RMOP

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 1.17%
• YTD: 3.38%
• 6M: 3.85%
• 1Y: 10.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JMHI

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.65%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.66%
• 1Y: 6.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMOP vs. JMHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
RMOP Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF	3.38%	3.90%	2.64%
JMHI JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF	1.55%	4.60%	1.36%

Correlation

The correlation between RMOP and JMHI is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2024	0.72

The correlation between RMOP and JMHI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RMOP vs. JMHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMOP

RMOP Risk / Return Rank: 82
RMOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
RMOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
RMOP Omega Ratio Rank: 89
RMOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
RMOP Martin Ratio Rank: 74

JMHI

JMHI Risk / Return Rank: 56
JMHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
JMHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
JMHI Omega Ratio Rank: 68
JMHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
JMHI Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMOP vs. JMHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP) and JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RMOP	JMHI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	1.99	+0.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.03	2.86	+1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.56	1.40	+0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.87	2.19	+1.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.86	7.65	+6.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RMOP vs. JMHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMOP Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is higher than the JMHI Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMOP and JMHI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RMOP	JMHI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.70	1.99	+0.71
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.99	1.05	-0.06

Drawdowns

RMOP vs. JMHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMOP drawdown since its inception was -6.67%, smaller than the maximum JMHI drawdown of -7.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMOP and JMHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	RMOP	JMHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.67%	-7.11%	+0.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.66%	-2.93%	+0.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.52%	+0.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.52%	-1.29%	-0.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.74%	0.84%	-0.10%

Volatility

RMOP vs. JMHI - Volatility Comparison

Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP) has a higher volatility of 1.21% compared to JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF (JMHI) at 1.08%. This indicates that RMOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RMOP	JMHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.21%	1.08%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.67%	2.32%	+0.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.81%	3.23%	+0.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.66%	4.49%	+1.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.66%	4.49%	+1.17%

RMOP vs. JMHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMOP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than JMHI's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

RMOP vs. JMHI - Dividend Comparison

RMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.20%, more than JMHI's 4.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
JMHI JPMorgan High Yield Municipal ETF	4.54%	4.42%	4.49%	2.48%
RMOP Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF	5.20%	5.15%	1.27%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RMOP and JMHI in my portfolio?

RMOP and JMHI have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RMOP or JMHI?

RMOP has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to JMHI (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMOP dropped -6.67% vs JMHI's -7.11%.

Which ETF is better, RMOP or JMHI?

On 1-year performance, RMOP leads with 10.23% vs 6.41% for JMHI. On fees, JMHI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JMHI has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RMOP or JMHI?

Over the 1-year period, RMOP has performed better with a 10.23% return vs 6.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RMOP or JMHI?

JMHI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for RMOP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RMOP or JMHI?

RMOP has the higher dividend yield at 5.20%, compared with 4.54% for JMHI.

What is the main difference between RMOP and JMHI?

They also come from different issuers: Rockefeller and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for RMOP and 0.35% for JMHI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RMOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.