RMOP vs. SHYM
RMOP (Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF) and SHYM (iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF) are both High Yield Muni funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RMOP returned 10.12% vs 7.65% for SHYM. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RMOP charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SHYM.
Performance
RMOP vs. SHYM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMOP achieves a 1.92% return, which is significantly higher than SHYM's 0.81% return.
RMOP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- YTD
- 1.92%
- 6M
- 2.95%
- 1Y
- 10.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHYM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 2.12%
- 1Y
- 7.65%
- 3Y*
- 5.16%
- 5Y*
- 1.20%
- 10Y*
- —
RMOP vs. SHYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
RMOP Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF | 1.92% | 3.90% | 2.64% |
SHYM iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF | 0.81% | 2.58% | 0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMOP and SHYM is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 14, 2024 | 0.57 |
The correlation between RMOP and SHYM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.57 — a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMOP vs. SHYM — Risk / Return Rank
RMOP
SHYM
RMOP vs. SHYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP) and iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF (SHYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMOP | SHYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.27 | 2.00 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.30 | 3.29 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.44 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 2.55 | +1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.04 | 8.71 | +3.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMOP | SHYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 2.00 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.24 | +0.65 |
Drawdowns
RMOP vs. SHYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMOP drawdown since its inception was -6.67%, smaller than the maximum SHYM drawdown of -22.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMOP and SHYM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMOP | SHYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.67% | -22.55% | +15.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.66% | -2.23% | -0.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -0.87% | +0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.62% | -6.93% | +5.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 0.65% | +0.13% |
Volatility
RMOP vs. SHYM - Volatility Comparison
Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF (RMOP) has a higher volatility of 1.72% compared to iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF (SHYM) at 1.23%. This indicates that RMOP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMOP | SHYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.72% | 1.23% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.49% | 1.80% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.55% | 4.23% | +0.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.79% | 7.08% | -1.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.79% | 7.03% | -1.24% |
RMOP vs. SHYM - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMOP has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SHYM's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
RMOP vs. SHYM - Dividend Comparison
RMOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, more than SHYM's 4.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMOP Rockefeller Opportunistic Municipal Bond ETF | 5.22% | 5.15% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHYM iShares Short Duration High Yield Muni Active ETF | 4.48% | 4.55% | 4.35% | 4.35% | 4.01% | 2.97% |