RMFGX vs. QLENX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RMFGX (American Mutual Fund Class R-6) and QLENX (AQR Long-Short Equity N) are both mutual funds - RMFGX is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by American Funds, while QLENX is a Long-Short fund actively managed by AQR Funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, RMFGX returned 11.51%/yr vs 11.73%/yr for QLENX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RMFGX charges 0.27%/yr vs 5.18%/yr for QLENX.

Performance

RMFGX vs. QLENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Mutual Fund Class R-6 (RMFGX) and AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMFGX achieves a 6.79% return, which is significantly higher than QLENX's 0.29% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RMFGX having a 11.51% annualized return and QLENX not far ahead at 11.73%.

RMFGX

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 2.98%
• YTD: 6.79%
• 6M: 7.03%
• 1Y: 17.63%
• 3Y*: 15.85%
• 5Y*: 10.66%
• 10Y*: 11.51%

QLENX

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 3.51%
• YTD: 0.29%
• 6M: 4.65%
• 1Y: 15.75%
• 3Y*: 27.39%
• 5Y*: 21.63%
• 10Y*: 11.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMFGX vs. QLENX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RMFGX American Mutual Fund Class R-6	6.79%	16.43%	15.28%	9.78%	-4.19%	25.28%	5.15%	21.92%	-2.00%	17.86%
QLENX AQR Long-Short Equity N	0.29%	34.07%	30.18%	23.67%	18.92%	30.70%	-14.18%	1.01%	-16.64%	15.48%

Correlation

The correlation between RMFGX and QLENX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2013	0.52

The correlation between RMFGX and QLENX shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (1 year) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RMFGX vs. QLENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMFGX

RMFGX Risk / Return Rank: 42
RMFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
RMFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
RMFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
RMFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
RMFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

QLENX

QLENX Risk / Return Rank: 51
QLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
QLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
QLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
QLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
QLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMFGX vs. QLENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Mutual Fund Class R-6 (RMFGX) and AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RMFGX	QLENX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.92	2.21	-0.29
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	3.25	-0.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.40	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	2.62	-0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.29	8.18	+1.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RMFGX vs. QLENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the QLENX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMFGX and QLENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RMFGX	QLENX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.92	2.21	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	2.16	-1.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	1.11	-0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.83	1.22	-0.39

Drawdowns

RMFGX vs. QLENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMFGX drawdown since its inception was -29.79%, smaller than the maximum QLENX drawdown of -38.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMFGX and QLENX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RMFGX	QLENX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.79%	-38.50%	+8.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.89%	-6.09%	-1.80%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.90%	-7.09%	-5.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.17%	-17.19%	+2.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.79%	-38.50%	+8.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.34%	+0.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.72%	-7.48%	+4.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.96%	1.95%	+0.01%

Volatility

RMFGX vs. QLENX - Volatility Comparison

American Mutual Fund Class R-6 (RMFGX) has a higher volatility of 2.34% compared to AQR Long-Short Equity N (QLENX) at 2.21%. This indicates that RMFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RMFGX	QLENX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.34%	2.21%	+0.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.34%	5.60%	+1.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.50%	7.27%	+2.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.51%	10.08%	+2.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.12%	10.59%	+3.53%

RMFGX vs. QLENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMFGX has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than QLENX's 5.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

RMFGX vs. QLENX - Dividend Comparison

RMFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%, more than QLENX's 1.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QLENX AQR Long-Short Equity N	1.63%	1.64%	7.13%	21.21%	14.09%	0.00%	1.59%	0.00%	6.09%	8.91%	2.87%	4.91%
RMFGX American Mutual Fund Class R-6	7.39%	7.85%	6.59%	4.06%	5.20%	4.88%	2.30%	4.89%	6.75%	6.23%	4.54%	6.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RMFGX and QLENX in my portfolio?

RMFGX and QLENX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RMFGX or QLENX?

RMFGX has higher volatility (2.34%) compared to QLENX (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMFGX dropped -29.79% vs QLENX's -38.50%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.