PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLENX vs. QNZNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLENX vs. QNZNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N (QLENX) and AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLENX achieves a -0.63% return, which is significantly lower than QNZNX's 15.35% return.


QLENX

1D
0.20%
1M
1.14%
YTD
-0.63%
6M
-1.26%
1Y
15.19%
3Y*
25.46%
5Y*
23.16%
10Y*
11.97%

QNZNX

1D
0.71%
1M
-0.75%
YTD
15.35%
6M
15.35%
1Y
36.55%
3Y*
30.04%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLENX vs. QNZNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QLENX
AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N
-0.63%34.07%30.18%23.67%4.41%
QNZNX
AQR Trend Total Return Fund
15.35%22.88%34.96%22.73%1.37%

Correlation

The correlation between QLENX and QNZNX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between QLENX and QNZNX has dropped to 0.52 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLENX vs. QNZNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLENX
QLENX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
QLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

QNZNX
QNZNX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
QNZNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QNZNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
QNZNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
QNZNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QNZNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLENX vs. QNZNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N (QLENX) and AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QLENXQNZNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.61

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

7.71

-5.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.88

27.56

-19.68

QLENX vs. QNZNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLENX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is lower than the QNZNX Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLENX and QNZNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QLENX vs. QNZNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLENX drawdown since its inception was -38.50%, which is greater than QNZNX's maximum drawdown of -18.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLENX and QNZNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLENXQNZNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.50%

-18.38%

-20.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.09%

-4.88%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.09%

-13.48%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-2.74%

+1.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.46%

-2.77%

-4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.36%

+0.61%

Volatility

QLENX vs. QNZNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N (QLENX) is 2.86%, while AQR Trend Total Return Fund (QNZNX) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that QLENX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QNZNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLENXQNZNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

3.42%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.78%

7.51%

-1.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.40%

11.02%

-3.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.01%

12.06%

-2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.60%

12.06%

-1.46%

QLENX vs. QNZNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLENX has a 1.57% expense ratio, which is higher than QNZNX's 1.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLENX vs. QNZNX - Dividend Comparison

QLENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, more than QNZNX's 0.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLENX
AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N
1.65%1.64%7.13%21.21%14.09%0.00%1.59%0.00%6.09%8.91%2.87%4.91%
QNZNX
AQR Trend Total Return Fund
0.74%0.86%16.46%23.14%2.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLENX and QNZNX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QNZNX has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to QLENX (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLENX dropped -38.50% vs QNZNX's -18.38%.

QNZNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLENX and QNZNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer