RMD vs. WKC
RMD (ResMed Inc.) and WKC (World Kinect Corporation) are both stocks. RMD operates in Medical Instruments & Supplies (Healthcare), while WKC operates in Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing (Energy). Over the past 10 years, RMD returned 13.03%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for WKC. Their 0.20 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RMD vs. WKC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMD achieves a -11.95% return, which is significantly lower than WKC's 72.78% return. Over the past 10 years, RMD has outperformed WKC with an annualized return of 13.03%, while WKC has yielded a comparatively lower 0.44% annualized return.
RMD
- 1D
- 1.16%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- 6M
- -17.89%
- YTD
- -11.95%
- 1Y
- -23.69%
- 3Y*
- -1.21%
- 5Y*
- -4.10%
- 10Y*
- 13.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 20.57%
WKC
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 20.02%
- 6M
- 50.43%
- YTD
- 72.78%
- 1Y
- 62.90%
- 3Y*
- 24.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.49%
- 10Y*
- 0.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.42%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
RMD ResMed Inc. | $221.77M | $287.46M | $300.95M |
| $65.86M | $52.05M | $36.32M |
RMD vs. WKC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMD ResMed Inc. | -11.95% | 6.26% | 34.18% | -16.55% | -19.47% | 23.41% | 38.33% | 37.85% | 36.38% | 39.06% |
WKC World Kinect Corporation | 72.78% | -12.32% | 23.82% | -14.60% | 5.32% | -13.74% | -27.09% | 104.82% | -23.15% | -38.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMD and WKC is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 1995 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
RMD:
$30.60B
WKC:
$2.04B
RMD:
$15.50
WKC:
-$3.32
RMD:
3.73
WKC:
0.05
RMD:
$5.54B
WKC:
$41.79B
RMD:
$3.42B
WKC:
$781.00M
RMD:
$2.10B
WKC:
-$119.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMD vs. WKC — Risk / Return Rank
RMD
WKC
RMD vs. WKC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ResMed Inc. (RMD) and World Kinect Corporation (WKC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMD | WKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.39 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.32 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 2.62 | -3.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 6.04 | -7.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMD vs. WKC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMD drawdown since its inception was -61.61%, smaller than the maximum WKC drawdown of -73.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMD and WKC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMD | WKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.61% | -73.84% | +12.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -37.28% | -19.49% | -17.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.28% | -25.40% | -11.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.99% | -45.43% | -8.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.99% | -57.94% | +3.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.62% | -18.00% | -9.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.06% | -30.24% | +14.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.03% | 8.60% | +11.43% |
Volatility
RMD vs. WKC - Volatility Comparison
ResMed Inc. (RMD) has a higher volatility of 12.95% compared to World Kinect Corporation (WKC) at 8.11%. This indicates that RMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WKC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMD | WKC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.95% | 8.11% | +4.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.18% | 20.69% | +2.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.51% | 29.48% | -1.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.52% | 35.07% | -3.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.69% | 42.45% | -10.76% |
Dividends
RMD vs. WKC - Dividend Comparison
RMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than WKC's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMD ResMed Inc. | 1.14% | 0.94% | 0.88% | 1.07% | 0.83% | 0.62% | 0.73% | 0.98% | 1.26% | 1.61% | 2.03% | 2.16% |
WKC World Kinect Corporation | 2.08% | 3.29% | 2.47% | 2.46% | 1.90% | 1.81% | 1.28% | 0.83% | 1.12% | 0.85% | 0.52% | 0.62% |
Financials
RMD vs. WKC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ResMed Inc. and World Kinect Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RMD vs. WKC - Profitability Comparison
RMD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a gross profit of 890.98M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.3%.
WKC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, World Kinect Corporation reported a gross profit of 365.10M and revenue of 13.67B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 2.7%.
RMD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ResMed Inc. reported an operating income of 499.81M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.
WKC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, World Kinect Corporation reported an operating income of 132.50M and revenue of 13.67B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.
RMD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a net income of 398.73M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 27.9%.
WKC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, World Kinect Corporation reported a net income of 49.00M and revenue of 13.67B, resulting in a net margin of 0.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RMD and WKC have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RMD has higher volatility (12.95%) compared to WKC (8.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMD dropped -61.61% vs WKC's -73.84%.
WKC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RMD and WKC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer