PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMD vs. K.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RMD vs. K.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ResMed Inc. (RMD) and Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RMD is traded in USD, while K.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the K.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMD achieves a -18.71% return, which is significantly lower than K.TO's -9.20% return. Over the past 10 years, RMD has underperformed K.TO with an annualized return of 13.85%, while K.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.68% annualized return.


RMD

1D
1.24%
1M
-3.46%
YTD
-18.71%
6M
-22.38%
1Y
-22.01%
3Y*
-2.26%
5Y*
-1.41%
10Y*
13.85%

K.TO

1D
2.85%
1M
-18.22%
YTD
-9.20%
6M
-8.18%
1Y
66.03%
3Y*
76.41%
5Y*
28.78%
10Y*
18.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RMD vs. K.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RMD
ResMed Inc.
-18.71%6.26%34.18%-16.55%-19.47%23.41%38.33%37.85%36.38%39.06%
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corporation
-9.20%205.76%55.88%52.77%-27.35%-20.20%56.50%46.02%-25.12%38.75%

Correlation

The correlation between RMD and K.TO is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006

0.13

Fundamentals

EPS

RMD:

$13.78

K.TO:

$2.36

PE Ratio

RMD:

14.14

K.TO:

10.83

PEG Ratio

RMD:

0.44

K.TO:

0.14

PS Ratio

RMD:

3.88

K.TO:

3.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

RMD:

$5.54B

K.TO:

$7.97B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RMD:

$3.42B

K.TO:

$4.26B

EBITDA (TTM)

RMD:

$2.10B

K.TO:

$5.03B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RMD vs. K.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMD
RMD Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
RMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMD Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
RMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMD Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

K.TO
K.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
K.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
K.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
K.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
K.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
K.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMD vs. K.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ResMed Inc. (RMD) and Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RMDK.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

1.24

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

1.77

-2.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.34

5.32

-6.66

RMD vs. K.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMD Sharpe Ratio is -0.92, which is lower than the K.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMD and K.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RMD vs. K.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMD drawdown since its inception was -61.61%, smaller than the maximum K.TO drawdown of -94.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMD and K.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RMDK.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.61%

-94.64%

+33.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-37.28%

-37.51%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.09%

-37.51%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.99%

-59.77%

+5.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-53.99%

-68.23%

+14.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.18%

-32.43%

-0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.00%

-61.04%

+45.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.49%

12.45%

+4.04%

Volatility

RMD vs. K.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ResMed Inc. (RMD) is 9.81%, while Kinross Gold Corporation (K.TO) has a volatility of 18.24%. This indicates that RMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than K.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RMDK.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.81%

18.24%

-8.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.30%

39.44%

-20.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.09%

51.24%

-27.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.07%

42.93%

-11.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.54%

45.97%

-14.43%

Dividends

RMD vs. K.TO - Dividend Comparison

RMD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than K.TO's 0.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
K.TO
Kinross Gold Corporation
0.56%0.45%1.23%2.04%2.68%1.63%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RMD
ResMed Inc.
1.23%0.94%0.88%1.07%0.83%0.62%0.73%0.98%1.26%1.61%2.03%2.16%

Financials

RMD vs. K.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between ResMed Inc. and Kinross Gold Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
1.43B
2.41B
(RMD) Total Revenue
(K.TO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RMD vs. K.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ResMed Inc. and Kinross Gold Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
62.3%
59.9%
Portfolio components
RMD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a gross profit of 890.98M and revenue of 1.43B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 62.3%.

K.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.44B and revenue of 2.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.9%.

RMD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported an operating income of 499.81M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in an operating margin of 34.9%.

K.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported an operating income of 1.33B and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 55.1%.

RMD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ResMed Inc. reported a net income of 398.73M and revenue of 1.43B, resulting in a net margin of 27.9%.

K.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kinross Gold Corporation reported a net income of 843.00M and revenue of 2.41B, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RMD and K.TO have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RMD and K.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer