RMBS vs. MU
RMBS (Rambus Inc.) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, RMBS returned 28.27%/yr vs 55.83%/yr for MU. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RMBS vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMBS achieves a 59.50% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 244.07% return. Over the past 10 years, RMBS has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 28.27%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 55.83% annualized return.
RMBS
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 8.68%
- YTD
- 59.50%
- 6M
- 55.53%
- 1Y
- 141.61%
- 3Y*
- 32.27%
- 5Y*
- 49.08%
- 10Y*
- 28.27%
MU
- 1D
- -1.43%
- 1M
- 22.15%
- YTD
- 244.07%
- 6M
- 307.41%
- 1Y
- 746.93%
- 3Y*
- 144.69%
- 5Y*
- 66.21%
- 10Y*
- 55.83%
RMBS vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMBS Rambus Inc. | 59.50% | 73.84% | -22.55% | 90.54% | 21.88% | 68.33% | 26.75% | 79.60% | -46.06% | 3.27% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 244.07% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 87.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMBS and MU is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 1997 | 0.48 |
The correlation between RMBS and MU shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (all time) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RMBS:
$16.08B
MU:
$1.12T
RMBS:
$2.11
MU:
$21.26
RMBS:
69.62
MU:
46.18
RMBS:
0.15
MU:
0.17
RMBS:
22.20
MU:
19.16
RMBS:
11.54
MU:
15.44
RMBS:
$721.16M
MU:
$58.12B
RMBS:
$555.52M
MU:
$33.96B
RMBS:
$298.07M
MU:
$25.99B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMBS vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
RMBS
MU
RMBS vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rambus Inc. (RMBS) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RMBS | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -8.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.78 | -0.47 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 24.91 | -21.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.73 | 94.64 | -84.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RMBS vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMBS drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, roughly equal to the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBS and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMBS | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.16% | -98.25% | +1.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.69% | -30.28% | -6.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.83% | -57.63% | +8.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.83% | -57.63% | +8.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.95% | -57.63% | +4.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.12% | -9.07% | -5.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.88% | -58.16% | -16.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.62% | 7.95% | +6.67% |
Volatility
RMBS vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rambus Inc. (RMBS) is 28.11%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 32.86%. This indicates that RMBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMBS | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.11% | 32.86% | -4.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 62.19% | 57.74% | +4.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.00% | 69.66% | +6.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.40% | 53.18% | +2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.30% | 50.12% | -3.82% |
Dividends
RMBS vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
RMBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.05% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
RMBS Rambus Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RMBS vs. MU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rambus Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RMBS vs. MU - Profitability Comparison
RMBS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a gross profit of 143.66M and revenue of 180.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.7%.
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.
RMBS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rambus Inc. reported an operating income of 61.76M and revenue of 180.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.3%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.
RMBS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a net income of 59.86M and revenue of 180.19M, resulting in a net margin of 33.2%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RMBS and MU have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MU has higher volatility (32.86%) compared to RMBS (28.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMBS dropped -97.16% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.83 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RMBS and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer