RMBS vs. INTT
RMBS (Rambus Inc.) and INTT (inTEST Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — RMBS in Semiconductors, INTT in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials. Over the past 10 years, RMBS returned 28.75%/yr vs 14.75%/yr for INTT. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RMBS vs. INTT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMBS achieves a 65.45% return, which is significantly lower than INTT's 109.24% return. Over the past 10 years, RMBS has outperformed INTT with an annualized return of 28.75%, while INTT has yielded a comparatively lower 14.75% annualized return.
RMBS
- 1D
- 4.62%
- 1M
- 17.63%
- YTD
- 65.45%
- 6M
- 46.08%
- 1Y
- 164.72%
- 3Y*
- 33.66%
- 5Y*
- 50.95%
- 10Y*
- 28.75%
INTT
- 1D
- 6.54%
- 1M
- -9.39%
- YTD
- 109.24%
- 6M
- 104.85%
- 1Y
- 154.15%
- 3Y*
- -15.13%
- 5Y*
- 1.58%
- 10Y*
- 14.75%
RMBS vs. INTT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMBS Rambus Inc. | 65.45% | 73.84% | -22.55% | 90.54% | 21.88% | 68.33% | 26.75% | 79.60% | -46.06% | 3.27% |
INTT inTEST Corporation | 109.24% | -13.04% | -36.84% | 32.04% | -19.03% | 96.00% | 9.07% | -2.94% | -29.13% | 88.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between RMBS and INTT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 1997 | 0.17 |
The correlation between RMBS and INTT shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RMBS:
$16.68B
INTT:
$194.15M
RMBS:
$2.11
INTT:
$0.05
RMBS:
72.22
INTT:
324.62
RMBS:
0.15
INTT:
7.91
RMBS:
23.03
INTT:
1.58
RMBS:
11.97
INTT:
1.86
RMBS:
$721.16M
INTT:
$121.07M
RMBS:
$555.52M
INTT:
$53.27M
RMBS:
$298.07M
INTT:
$4.93M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RMBS vs. INTT — Risk / Return Rank
RMBS
INTT
RMBS vs. INTT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rambus Inc. (RMBS) and inTEST Corporation (INTT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMBS | INTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.35 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.52 | 6.93 | -2.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.42 | 17.24 | -5.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMBS | INTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 2.41 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.93 | 0.03 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.26 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.03 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
RMBS vs. INTT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMBS drawdown since its inception was -97.16%, roughly equal to the maximum INTT drawdown of -99.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBS and INTT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMBS | INTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.16% | -99.53% | +2.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.69% | -22.38% | -14.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.83% | -78.82% | +29.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.83% | -78.82% | +29.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.95% | -78.82% | +25.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.92% | -41.92% | +31.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -74.93% | -73.73% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.49% | 8.98% | +5.51% |
Volatility
RMBS vs. INTT - Volatility Comparison
Rambus Inc. (RMBS) and inTEST Corporation (INTT) have volatilities of 27.31% and 26.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RMBS | INTT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.31% | 26.12% | +1.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 61.70% | 50.32% | +11.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.72% | 64.42% | +11.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.30% | 59.16% | -3.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 46.24% | 56.78% | -10.54% |
Dividends
RMBS vs. INTT - Dividend Comparison
Neither RMBS nor INTT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
RMBS vs. INTT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rambus Inc. and inTEST Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RMBS vs. INTT - Profitability Comparison
RMBS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a gross profit of 143.66M and revenue of 180.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 79.7%.
INTT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, inTEST Corporation reported a gross profit of 15.41M and revenue of 33.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.5%.
RMBS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rambus Inc. reported an operating income of 61.76M and revenue of 180.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 34.3%.
INTT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, inTEST Corporation reported an operating income of 954.00K and revenue of 33.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.
RMBS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rambus Inc. reported a net income of 59.86M and revenue of 180.19M, resulting in a net margin of 33.2%.
INTT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, inTEST Corporation reported a net income of 789.00K and revenue of 33.89M, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RMBS and INTT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RMBS has higher volatility (27.31%) compared to INTT (26.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RMBS dropped -97.16% vs INTT's -99.53%.
INTT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RMBS and INTT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer