PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
INTT vs. RS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

INTT vs. RS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in inTEST Corporation (INTT) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTT achieves a 122.76% return, which is significantly higher than RS's 37.40% return. Over the past 10 years, INTT has underperformed RS with an annualized return of 15.98%, while RS has yielded a comparatively higher 20.31% annualized return.


INTT

1D
-3.14%
1M
-10.25%
YTD
122.76%
6M
114.43%
1Y
161.64%
3Y*
-9.75%
5Y*
2.02%
10Y*
15.98%

RS

1D
0.60%
1M
8.95%
YTD
37.40%
6M
37.81%
1Y
29.89%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
20.17%
10Y*
20.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

INTT vs. RS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
INTT
inTEST Corporation
122.76%-13.04%-36.84%32.04%-19.03%96.00%9.07%-2.94%-29.13%88.04%
RS
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
37.40%9.12%-2.33%40.29%27.08%37.84%2.42%72.21%-15.12%10.49%

Correlation

The correlation between INTT and RS is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 1997

0.14

The correlation between INTT and RS shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

INTT:

$0.05

RS:

$14.01

PE Ratio

INTT:

345.59

RS:

28.12

PS Ratio

INTT:

1.69

RS:

1.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

INTT:

$121.07M

RS:

$14.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

INTT:

$53.27M

RS:

$3.90B

EBITDA (TTM)

INTT:

$4.93M

RS:

$1.30B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

INTT vs. RS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTT
INTT Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
INTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
INTT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
INTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
INTT Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

RS
RS Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
RS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
RS Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
RS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
RS Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTT vs. RS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for inTEST Corporation (INTT) and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


INTTRSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.26

1.35

+6.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.46

2.32

+16.14

INTT vs. RS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTT Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the RS Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTT and RS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


INTTRSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

1.20

+1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

0.72

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

0.69

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.04

0.46

-0.42

Drawdowns

INTT vs. RS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTT drawdown since its inception was -99.53%, which is greater than RS's maximum drawdown of -83.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTT and RS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


INTTRSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.53%

-83.80%

-15.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.69%

-22.30%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.82%

-22.30%

-56.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.82%

-22.32%

-56.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.82%

-40.83%

-37.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-38.16%

0.00%

-38.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.74%

-16.49%

-57.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.79%

12.90%

-4.11%

Volatility

INTT vs. RS - Volatility Comparison

inTEST Corporation (INTT) has a higher volatility of 24.33% compared to Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. (RS) at 6.35%. This indicates that INTT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


INTTRSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.33%

6.35%

+17.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

48.30%

17.00%

+31.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

62.29%

25.06%

+37.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.72%

27.98%

+30.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.54%

29.64%

+26.90%

Dividends

INTT vs. RS - Dividend Comparison

INTT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INTT
inTEST Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RS
Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.
1.24%1.66%1.63%1.43%1.73%1.70%2.09%1.84%2.81%2.10%2.07%2.76%

Financials

INTT vs. RS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between inTEST Corporation and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
33.89M
3.50B
(INTT) Total Revenue
(RS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

INTT vs. RS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between inTEST Corporation and Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
45.5%
25.3%
Portfolio components
INTT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, inTEST Corporation reported a gross profit of 15.41M and revenue of 33.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.5%.

RS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a gross profit of 885.40M and revenue of 3.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.3%.

INTT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, inTEST Corporation reported an operating income of 954.00K and revenue of 33.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.8%.

RS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported an operating income of 176.20M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.0%.

INTT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, inTEST Corporation reported a net income of 789.00K and revenue of 33.89M, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.

RS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. reported a net income of 116.50M and revenue of 3.50B, resulting in a net margin of 3.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


INTT and RS have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

INTT has higher volatility (24.33%) compared to RS (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, INTT dropped -99.53% vs RS's -83.80%.

INTT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for INTT and RS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer