INTT vs. KLAC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about inTEST Corporation (INTT) and KLA Corporation (KLAC).

Performance

INTT vs. KLAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in inTEST Corporation (INTT) and KLA Corporation (KLAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

INTT vs. KLAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
INTT inTEST Corporation	82.73%	-13.04%	-36.84%	32.04%	-19.03%	96.00%	9.07%	-2.94%	-29.13%	88.04%
KLAC KLA Corporation	21.34%	94.48%	9.36%	56.05%	-11.20%	68.05%	47.94%	103.99%	-12.49%	36.80%

Fundamentals

Market Cap INTT : $167.59M KLAC : $194.66B
EPS INTT : -$0.21 KLAC : $34.42
PS Ratio INTT : 1.47 KLAC : 15.30
PB Ratio INTT : 1.62 KLAC : 35.61
Total Revenue (TTM) INTT : $113.83M KLAC : $12.74B
Gross Profit (TTM) INTT : $48.92M KLAC : $7.89B
EBITDA (TTM) INTT : $3.08M KLAC : $5.71B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, INTT achieves a 82.73% return, which is significantly higher than KLAC's 21.34% return. Over the past 10 years, INTT has underperformed KLAC with an annualized return of 12.78%, while KLAC has yielded a comparatively higher 37.36% annualized return.

INTT

• 1D: 4.76%
• 1M: 17.17%
• YTD: 82.73%
• 6M: 74.78%
• 1Y: 95.28%
• 3Y*: -13.02%
• 5Y*: 2.36%
• 10Y*: 12.78%

KLAC

• 1D: 6.50%
• 1M: -3.42%
• YTD: 21.34%
• 6M: 36.92%
• 1Y: 118.24%
• 3Y*: 55.93%
• 5Y*: 34.90%
• 10Y*: 37.36%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

INTT vs. KLAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

INTT

INTT Risk / Return Rank: 86
INTT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
INTT Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
INTT Omega Ratio Rank: 80
INTT Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
INTT Martin Ratio Rank: 88

KLAC

KLAC Risk / Return Rank: 93
KLAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
KLAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
KLAC Omega Ratio Rank: 91
KLAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
KLAC Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

INTT vs. KLAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for inTEST Corporation (INTT) and KLA Corporation (KLAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	INTT	KLAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	2.41	-0.70
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	2.74	-0.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.40	-0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.74	5.37	-0.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.28	17.17	-7.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

INTT vs. KLAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current INTT Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the KLAC Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of INTT and KLAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	INTT	KLAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.71	2.41	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	0.82	-0.78
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23	0.92	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.43	-0.40

Correlation

The correlation between INTT and KLAC is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

INTT vs. KLAC - Dividend Comparison

INTT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KLAC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
INTT inTEST Corporation	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KLAC KLA Corporation	0.52%	0.61%	0.96%	0.92%	1.25%	0.91%	1.35%	1.74%	3.17%	2.15%	2.67%	2.94%

Drawdowns

INTT vs. KLAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum INTT drawdown since its inception was -99.53%, which is greater than KLAC's maximum drawdown of -83.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for INTT and KLAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	INTT	KLAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.53%	-83.74%	-15.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.69%	-22.41%	+2.72%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.82%	-40.28%	-38.54%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.82%	-40.28%	-38.54%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.28%	-12.49%	-36.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.96%	-29.47%	-44.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.06%	7.00%	+3.06%

Volatility

INTT vs. KLAC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for inTEST Corporation (INTT) is 15.51%, while KLA Corporation (KLAC) has a volatility of 17.00%. This indicates that INTT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KLAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	INTT	KLAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.51%	17.00%	-1.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.27%	37.03%	+6.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	56.15%	49.32%	+6.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.33%	42.63%	+15.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	55.73%	40.93%	+14.80%

Financials

INTT vs. KLAC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between inTEST Corporation and KLA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

INTT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, inTEST Corporation reported a gross profit of 14.90M and revenue of 32.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.4%.

KLAC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, KLA Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.03B and revenue of 3.30B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 61.5%.

INTT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, inTEST Corporation reported an operating income of 1.28M and revenue of 32.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.9%.

KLAC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, KLA Corporation reported an operating income of 1.36B and revenue of 3.30B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.3%.

INTT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, inTEST Corporation reported a net income of 1.24M and revenue of 32.82M, resulting in a net margin of 3.8%.

KLAC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, KLA Corporation reported a net income of 1.15B and revenue of 3.30B, resulting in a net margin of 34.8%.