RMBKX vs. FRBAX
Compare and contrast key facts about RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) and John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX).
RMBKX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jun 7, 1999. FRBAX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Jan 3, 1992.
Performance
RMBKX vs. FRBAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RMBKX vs. FRBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMBKX RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund | -0.36% | 12.84% | 17.07% | 4.56% | -19.18% | 56.40% | -5.73% | 22.82% | -17.13% | 12.17% |
FRBAX John Hancock Regional Bank Fund | -1.16% | 11.07% | 22.54% | -1.93% | -12.25% | 40.51% | -10.11% | 27.60% | -17.61% | 10.32% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RMBKX achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly higher than FRBAX's -1.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RMBKX having a 9.85% annualized return and FRBAX not far behind at 9.54%.
RMBKX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -3.80%
- YTD
- -0.36%
- 6M
- 10.76%
- 1Y
- 19.68%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- 5.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
FRBAX
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- YTD
- -1.16%
- 6M
- 3.72%
- 1Y
- 16.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.96%
- 10Y*
- 9.54%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RMBKX vs. FRBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RMBKX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FRBAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RMBKX vs. FRBAX — Risk / Return Rank
RMBKX
FRBAX
RMBKX vs. FRBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) and John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RMBKX | FRBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.85 | 0.67 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 1.04 | +0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.15 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.48 | 1.02 | +0.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 2.64 | +1.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RMBKX | FRBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 | 0.67 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.19 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.33 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.39 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between RMBKX and FRBAX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RMBKX vs. FRBAX - Dividend Comparison
RMBKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%, less than FRBAX's 8.90% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RMBKX RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund | 6.24% | 6.22% | 1.90% | 1.29% | 17.29% | 1.35% | 0.00% | 0.85% | 5.39% | 6.63% | 1.50% | 0.00% |
FRBAX John Hancock Regional Bank Fund | 8.90% | 8.82% | 9.72% | 2.65% | 5.83% | 5.26% | 2.43% | 1.75% | 1.92% | 1.76% | 2.94% | 4.42% |
Drawdowns
RMBKX vs. FRBAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RMBKX drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, smaller than the maximum FRBAX drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBKX and FRBAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RMBKX | FRBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -67.55% | +12.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.67% | -14.22% | +1.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -44.33% | -46.15% | +1.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.45% | -52.24% | -3.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.06% | -12.05% | +3.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.19% | -12.32% | +1.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 5.51% | -1.13% |
Volatility
RMBKX vs. FRBAX - Volatility Comparison
RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) and John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX) have volatilities of 4.82% and 4.65%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RMBKX | FRBAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 4.65% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.55% | 16.26% | -0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.42% | 25.52% | -1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.97% | 26.63% | -1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.10% | 29.30% | -2.20% |