FRBAX vs. QQQ
FRBAX (John Hancock Regional Bank Fund) and QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) are both funds - FRBAX is a Financials Equities fund managed by John Hancock, while QQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, FRBAX returned 10.85%/yr vs 22.07%/yr for QQQ. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FRBAX charges 1.22%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQ.
Performance
FRBAX vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FRBAX achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 16.45% return. Over the past 10 years, FRBAX has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 10.85%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 22.07% annualized return.
FRBAX
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 4.97%
- YTD
- 12.63%
- 6M
- 9.88%
- 1Y
- 28.70%
- 3Y*
- 26.25%
- 5Y*
- 7.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.85%
QQQ
- 1D
- -3.29%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 16.45%
- 6M
- 14.99%
- 1Y
- 34.88%
- 3Y*
- 26.05%
- 5Y*
- 16.01%
- 10Y*
- 22.07%
FRBAX vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRBAX John Hancock Regional Bank Fund | 12.63% | 11.07% | 22.54% | -1.93% | -12.25% | 40.51% | -10.11% | 27.60% | -17.61% | 10.32% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 16.45% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FRBAX and QQQ is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 1999 | 0.52 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FRBAX and QQQ has dropped to 0.27 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FRBAX vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
FRBAX
QQQ
FRBAX vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FRBAX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.35 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 2.93 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.97 | 10.86 | -4.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FRBAX vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FRBAX drawdown since its inception was -67.55%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRBAX and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FRBAX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.55% | -82.97% | +15.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.22% | -11.96% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.26% | -22.77% | -2.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.15% | -35.12% | -11.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.24% | -35.12% | -17.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.21% | -4.25% | +3.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.27% | -32.73% | +20.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.35% | 3.22% | +2.13% |
Volatility
FRBAX vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Regional Bank Fund (FRBAX) is 5.89%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 9.17%. This indicates that FRBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FRBAX | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.89% | 9.17% | -3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.83% | 14.57% | +0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.51% | 17.96% | +3.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.45% | 22.69% | +3.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.33% | 22.42% | +6.91% |
FRBAX vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FRBAX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
FRBAX vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
FRBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.41%, more than QQQ's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRBAX John Hancock Regional Bank Fund | 7.41% | 8.82% | 9.72% | 2.65% | 5.83% | 5.26% | 2.43% | 1.75% | 1.92% | 1.76% | 2.94% | 4.42% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.43% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FRBAX and QQQ have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QQQ has higher volatility (9.17%) compared to FRBAX (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FRBAX dropped -67.55% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FRBAX and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer