PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RMBKX vs. ECAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RMBKX vs. ECAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RMBKX vs. ECAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RMBKX
RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund
-0.36%12.84%17.07%4.56%-19.18%10.22%
ECAT
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust
-6.71%16.64%19.96%32.36%-21.90%-6.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RMBKX achieves a -0.36% return, which is significantly higher than ECAT's -6.71% return.


RMBKX

1D
0.25%
1M
-3.80%
YTD
-0.36%
6M
10.76%
1Y
19.68%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
5.98%
10Y*
9.85%

ECAT

1D
1.49%
1M
-8.56%
YTD
-6.71%
6M
-7.80%
1Y
7.03%
3Y*
13.21%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RMBKX vs. ECAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RMBKX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than ECAT's 1.38% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RMBKX vs. ECAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RMBKX
RMBKX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
RMBKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMBKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMBKX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
RMBKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMBKX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

ECAT
ECAT Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
ECAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ECAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
ECAT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
ECAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ECAT Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RMBKX vs. ECAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) and BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RMBKXECATDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

0.42

+0.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

0.68

+0.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.09

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

0.47

+1.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.29

1.75

+2.54

RMBKX vs. ECAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RMBKX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is higher than the ECAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RMBKX and ECAT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RMBKXECATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

0.42

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.32

+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between RMBKX and ECAT is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RMBKX vs. ECAT - Dividend Comparison

RMBKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.24%, less than ECAT's 25.39% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
RMBKX
RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund
6.24%6.22%1.90%1.29%17.29%1.35%0.00%0.85%5.39%6.63%1.50%
ECAT
BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust
25.39%23.00%17.44%9.14%8.94%0.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RMBKX vs. ECAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RMBKX drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, which is greater than ECAT's maximum drawdown of -32.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RMBKX and ECAT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RMBKXECATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.45%

-32.23%

-23.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.67%

-12.90%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.06%

-10.48%

+2.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.19%

-9.41%

-1.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.38%

3.49%

+0.89%

Volatility

RMBKX vs. ECAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RMB Mendon Financial Services Fund (RMBKX) is 4.82%, while BlackRock ESG Capital Allocation Term Trust (ECAT) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that RMBKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ECAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RMBKXECATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

5.97%

-1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.55%

10.34%

+5.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.42%

16.97%

+7.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.97%

16.95%

+8.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.10%

16.95%

+10.15%