PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RLY vs. RPAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RLY vs. RPAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RLY vs. RPAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RLY
SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
14.90%20.26%2.53%2.56%7.86%22.85%-0.59%2.00%
RPAR
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
4.45%17.91%0.06%6.03%-22.82%7.56%19.40%0.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLY achieves a 14.90% return, which is significantly higher than RPAR's 4.45% return.


RLY

1D
-0.14%
1M
-0.48%
YTD
14.90%
6M
19.17%
1Y
30.37%
3Y*
13.06%
5Y*
12.01%
10Y*
8.81%

RPAR

1D
0.58%
1M
-4.89%
YTD
4.45%
6M
6.49%
1Y
16.02%
3Y*
7.42%
5Y*
2.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RLY vs. RPAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RLY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than RPAR's 0.51% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RLY vs. RPAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLY
RLY Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

RPAR
RPAR Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
RPAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RPAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
RPAR Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
RPAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RPAR Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLY vs. RPAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RLYRPARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.31

1.37

+0.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.01

1.89

+1.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.26

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

2.02

+1.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.32

7.13

+11.19

RLY vs. RPAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLY Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the RPAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLY and RPAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RLYRPARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.31

1.37

+0.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

0.19

+0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.33

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between RLY and RPAR is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RLY vs. RPAR - Dividend Comparison

RLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, more than RPAR's 2.13% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RLY
SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF
2.92%3.24%3.31%3.71%5.66%12.15%2.16%3.45%2.76%1.85%2.07%1.80%
RPAR
RPAR Risk Parity ETF
2.13%2.55%2.51%3.16%4.01%2.02%0.76%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

RLY vs. RPAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLY drawdown since its inception was -37.75%, which is greater than RPAR's maximum drawdown of -30.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLY and RPAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RLYRPARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.75%

-30.16%

-7.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.94%

-8.10%

-1.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.94%

-30.16%

+11.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-5.42%

+4.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.56%

-11.83%

+2.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.68%

2.30%

-0.62%

Volatility

RLY vs. RPAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) is 3.03%, while RPAR Risk Parity ETF (RPAR) has a volatility of 4.61%. This indicates that RLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RLYRPARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.03%

4.61%

-1.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.54%

7.76%

+0.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.22%

11.74%

+1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.60%

12.35%

+1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.82%

12.73%

+1.09%