RLY vs. DBMF

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF).

RLY and DBMF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RLY is an actively managed fund by State Street. It was launched on Apr 25, 2012. DBMF is an actively managed fund by Litman Gregory Capital Partners LLC. It was launched on May 8, 2019.

Performance

RLY vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

RLY vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF	14.90%	20.26%	2.53%	2.56%	7.86%	22.85%	-0.59%	6.16%
DBMF iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	8.09%	13.85%	7.24%	-8.94%	21.61%	11.49%	1.80%	10.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLY achieves a 14.90% return, which is significantly higher than DBMF's 8.09% return.

RLY

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -0.48%
• YTD: 14.90%
• 6M: 19.17%
• 1Y: 30.37%
• 3Y*: 13.06%
• 5Y*: 12.01%
• 10Y*: 8.81%

DBMF

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -3.07%
• YTD: 8.09%
• 6M: 15.25%
• 1Y: 26.29%
• 3Y*: 9.97%
• 5Y*: 8.67%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLY vs. DBMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

RLY has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DBMF's 0.85% expense ratio.

DBMF

iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF

RLY

SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF

Return for Risk

RLY vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLY

RLY Risk / Return Rank: 94
RLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
RLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
RLY Omega Ratio Rank: 95
RLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
RLY Martin Ratio Rank: 96

DBMF

DBMF Risk / Return Rank: 95
DBMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
DBMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
DBMF Omega Ratio Rank: 95
DBMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
DBMF Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLY vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) and iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RLY	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	2.19	+0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.01	2.98	+0.03
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.46	+0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	4.35	-1.25
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	18.32	18.69	-0.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RLY vs. DBMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLY Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the DBMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLY and DBMF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RLY	DBMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.31	2.19	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89	0.69	+0.20
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.37	0.74	-0.37

Correlation

The correlation between RLY and DBMF is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

RLY vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison

RLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, less than DBMF's 5.29% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RLY SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF	2.92%	3.24%	3.31%	3.71%	5.66%	12.15%	2.16%	3.45%	2.76%	1.85%	2.07%	1.80%
DBMF iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF	5.29%	5.91%	5.75%	2.91%	7.72%	10.38%	0.86%	9.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

RLY vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLY drawdown since its inception was -37.75%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLY and DBMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	RLY	DBMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.75%	-20.39%	-17.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.94%	-6.10%	-3.84%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.94%	-20.39%	+1.45%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.48%	-3.63%	+3.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.56%	-6.70%	-2.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	1.42%	+0.26%

Volatility

RLY vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR SSgA Multi-Asset Real Return ETF (RLY) is 3.03%, while iM DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) has a volatility of 4.20%. This indicates that RLY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RLY	DBMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.03%	4.20%	-1.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.54%	11.10%	-2.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.22%	12.09%	+1.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.60%	12.66%	+0.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.82%	12.48%	+1.34%