RLTY vs. RA

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

RLTY (Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund) is a stock, while RA (Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.) is Multisector Bonds fund managed by Brookfield. Over the past 3 years, RLTY returned 14.75%/yr vs 1.87%/yr for RA. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RLTY vs. RA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLTY achieves a 10.21% return, which is significantly higher than RA's 2.80% return.

RLTY

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -0.89%
• YTD: 10.21%
• 6M: 9.62%
• 1Y: 12.63%
• 3Y*: 14.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RA

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -0.55%
• YTD: 2.80%
• 6M: 1.70%
• 1Y: 9.34%
• 3Y*: 1.87%
• 5Y*: 0.48%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLTY vs. RA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund	10.21%	8.56%	15.40%	14.05%	-27.73%
RA Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.	2.80%	8.32%	15.87%	-9.02%	-11.46%

Correlation

The correlation between RLTY and RA is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022	0.36

Return for Risk

RLTY vs. RA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLTY

RLTY Risk / Return Rank: 67
RLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
RLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
RLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 63
RLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
RLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 71

RA

RA Risk / Return Rank: 19
RA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
RA Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
RA Omega Ratio Rank: 22
RA Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
RA Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLTY vs. RA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RLTY	RA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	1.11	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	1.65	-0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.21	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	1.39	-0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.69	3.97	-0.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RLTY vs. RA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the RA Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLTY and RA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RLTY	RA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96	1.11	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.03	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.28	-0.15

Drawdowns

RLTY vs. RA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLTY drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, smaller than the maximum RA drawdown of -50.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLTY and RA.

Drawdown Indicators

	RLTY	RA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.44%	-50.66%	+15.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.40%	-6.73%	-4.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.81%	-28.42%	+7.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.39%	-3.73%	+2.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.73%	-8.08%	-5.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	2.36%	+1.07%

Volatility

RLTY vs. RA - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) at 2.42%. This indicates that RLTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RLTY	RA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.95%	2.42%	+1.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.15%	6.68%	+3.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.17%	8.50%	+4.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.73%	17.60%	+5.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.73%	20.64%	+2.09%

Dividends

RLTY vs. RA - Dividend Comparison

RLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.45%, less than RA's 11.12% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
RA Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.	11.12%	10.93%	10.63%	16.74%	14.79%	11.31%	13.39%	11.19%	12.52%	10.22%	0.89%
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund	8.45%	8.98%	8.93%	9.18%	6.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RLTY and RA in my portfolio?

RLTY and RA have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RLTY or RA?

RLTY has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to RA (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLTY dropped -35.44% vs RA's -50.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.