PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RA vs. TQPAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RA vs. TQPAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) and Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities Fund (TQPAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RA achieves a 3.52% return, which is significantly higher than TQPAX's 1.03% return.


RA

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
3.52%
6M
4.41%
1Y
8.85%
3Y*
2.83%
5Y*
0.64%
10Y*

TQPAX

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.74%
YTD
1.03%
6M
1.44%
1Y
5.74%
3Y*
7.76%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RA vs. TQPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RA
Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.
3.52%8.32%15.87%-9.02%-13.47%0.31%
TQPAX
Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities Fund
1.03%8.97%7.26%8.37%-9.86%-0.64%

Correlation

The correlation between RA and TQPAX is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2021

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RA vs. TQPAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RA
RA Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
RA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
RA Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
RA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
RA Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

TQPAX
TQPAX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TQPAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQPAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQPAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
TQPAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQPAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RA vs. TQPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) and Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities Fund (TQPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RATQPAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.36

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

2.54

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.59

8.82

-5.24

RA vs. TQPAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RA Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is lower than the TQPAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RA and TQPAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RA vs. TQPAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RA drawdown since its inception was -50.66%, which is greater than TQPAX's maximum drawdown of -16.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RA and TQPAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RATQPAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.66%

-16.94%

-33.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.73%

-2.40%

-4.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.42%

-4.17%

-24.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-0.59%

-2.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.06%

-4.33%

-3.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

0.69%

+1.78%

Volatility

RA vs. TQPAX - Volatility Comparison

Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc. (RA) has a higher volatility of 1.74% compared to Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities Fund (TQPAX) at 0.99%. This indicates that RA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TQPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RATQPAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.74%

0.99%

+0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.65%

2.66%

+3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.52%

3.70%

+4.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.57%

5.11%

+12.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.60%

5.11%

+15.49%

RA vs. TQPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RA has a 2.76% expense ratio, which is higher than TQPAX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

RA vs. TQPAX - Dividend Comparison

RA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.15%, more than TQPAX's 4.67% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
RA
Brookfield Real Assets Income Fund Inc.
11.15%10.93%10.63%16.74%14.79%11.31%13.39%11.19%12.52%10.22%0.89%
TQPAX
Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities Fund
4.67%4.20%4.43%4.95%4.02%1.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RA and TQPAX have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RA has higher volatility (1.74%) compared to TQPAX (0.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RA dropped -50.66% vs TQPAX's -16.94%.

TQPAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RA and TQPAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer