RLTY vs. PDX

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

RLTY (Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund) is a stock, while PDX (PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund) is Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by PIMCO. Over the past 3 years, RLTY returned 14.75%/yr vs 25.37%/yr for PDX. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RLTY vs. PDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLTY achieves a 10.21% return, which is significantly lower than PDX's 16.96% return.

RLTY

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -0.89%
• YTD: 10.21%
• 6M: 9.62%
• 1Y: 12.63%
• 3Y*: 14.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PDX

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 1.25%
• YTD: 16.96%
• 6M: 18.79%
• 1Y: 10.21%
• 3Y*: 25.37%
• 5Y*: 21.65%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLTY vs. PDX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund	10.21%	8.56%	15.40%	14.05%	-27.73%
PDX PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund	16.96%	-10.59%	36.99%	44.51%	16.08%

Correlation

The correlation between RLTY and PDX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022	0.29

The correlation between RLTY and PDX shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

RLTY vs. PDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLTY

RLTY Risk / Return Rank: 67
RLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
RLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
RLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 63
RLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
RLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 71

PDX

PDX Risk / Return Rank: 9
PDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
PDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
PDX Omega Ratio Rank: 10
PDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
PDX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLTY vs. PDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RLTY	PDX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	0.71	+0.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	1.09	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.13	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.11	0.66	+0.46
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.69	1.50	+2.20
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RLTY vs. PDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the PDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLTY and PDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RLTY	PDX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96	0.71	+0.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.85	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	0.30	-0.16

Drawdowns

RLTY vs. PDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLTY drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, smaller than the maximum PDX drawdown of -80.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLTY and PDX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RLTY	PDX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.44%	-80.63%	+45.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.40%	-15.65%	+4.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.81%	-37.24%	+16.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-37.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.39%	-15.04%	+13.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.73%	-18.84%	+5.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.43%	6.84%	-3.41%

Volatility

RLTY vs. PDX - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) at 2.71%. This indicates that RLTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RLTY	PDX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.95%	2.71%	+1.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.15%	10.17%	-0.02%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.17%	14.40%	-1.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.73%	25.61%	-2.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.73%	36.46%	-13.73%

Dividends

RLTY vs. PDX - Dividend Comparison

RLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.45%, less than PDX's 21.50% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PDX PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund	21.50%	24.34%	6.31%	4.30%	5.89%	5.28%	14.11%	9.58%
RLTY Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund	8.45%	8.98%	8.93%	9.18%	6.94%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RLTY and PDX in my portfolio?

RLTY and PDX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RLTY or PDX?

RLTY has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to PDX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLTY dropped -35.44% vs PDX's -80.63%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RLTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.