PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDX vs. PAAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDX vs. PAAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) and PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDX achieves a 15.17% return, which is significantly higher than PAAA's 2.24% return.


PDX

1D
0.10%
1M
-3.76%
YTD
15.17%
6M
16.19%
1Y
4.63%
3Y*
25.27%
5Y*
21.66%
10Y*

PAAA

1D
0.02%
1M
0.26%
YTD
2.24%
6M
2.39%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDX vs. PAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PDX
PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund
15.17%-10.59%36.99%27.58%
PAAA
PGIM AAA CLO ETF
2.24%5.37%7.47%3.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PDX and PAAA is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2023

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDX vs. PAAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDX
PDX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
PDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
PDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

PAAA
PAAA Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
PAAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PAAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
PAAA Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PAAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
PAAA Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDX vs. PAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) and PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDXPAAADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-10.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-20.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

6.78

-5.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

29.61

-29.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.67

183.59

-182.91

PDX vs. PAAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.33, which is lower than the PAAA Sharpe Ratio of 11.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDX and PAAA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDX vs. PAAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDX drawdown since its inception was -80.63%, which is greater than PAAA's maximum drawdown of -1.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDX and PAAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDXPAAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.63%

-1.04%

-79.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.65%

-0.17%

-15.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.35%

0.00%

-16.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.81%

-0.02%

-18.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.89%

0.03%

+6.86%

Volatility

PDX vs. PAAA - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) has a higher volatility of 2.06% compared to PGIM AAA CLO ETF (PAAA) at 0.10%. This indicates that PDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAAA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDXPAAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.06%

0.10%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

0.35%

+9.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.24%

0.47%

+13.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.50%

0.97%

+24.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.36%

0.97%

+35.39%

PDX vs. PAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDX has a 2.31% expense ratio, which is higher than PAAA's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDX vs. PAAA - Dividend Comparison

PDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.98%, more than PAAA's 4.87% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PAAA
PGIM AAA CLO ETF
4.87%5.12%5.88%2.76%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PDX
PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund
21.98%24.34%6.31%4.30%5.89%5.28%14.11%9.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDX and PAAA have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDX has higher volatility (2.06%) compared to PAAA (0.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDX dropped -80.63% vs PAAA's -1.04%.

PAAA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.01 vs 0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDX and PAAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer