PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RLTY vs. BST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RLTY vs. BST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLTY achieves a 10.21% return, which is significantly lower than BST's 16.91% return.


RLTY

1D
-0.64%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
10.21%
6M
9.62%
1Y
12.63%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
10Y*

BST

1D
-0.09%
1M
2.92%
YTD
16.91%
6M
19.17%
1Y
36.42%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
3.96%
10Y*
19.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RLTY vs. BST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
RLTY
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund
10.21%8.56%15.40%14.05%-27.73%
BST
BlackRock Science and Technology Trust
16.91%23.65%17.96%30.07%-26.98%

Correlation

The correlation between RLTY and BST is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between RLTY and BST has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RLTY vs. BST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RLTY
RLTY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
RLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

BST
BST Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BST Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
BST Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BST Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
BST Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RLTY vs. BST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) and BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RLTYBSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.35

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.39

-1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.69

7.82

-4.13

RLTY vs. BST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the BST Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLTY and BST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RLTYBSTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

1.93

-0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.63

-0.50

Drawdowns

RLTY vs. BST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLTY drawdown since its inception was -35.44%, smaller than the maximum BST drawdown of -47.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLTY and BST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLTYBSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.44%

-47.72%

+12.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-15.31%

+3.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.81%

-23.37%

+2.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-7.74%

+6.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.73%

-12.97%

-0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

4.67%

-1.24%

Volatility

RLTY vs. BST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) is 3.95%, while BlackRock Science and Technology Trust (BST) has a volatility of 8.82%. This indicates that RLTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLTYBSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

8.82%

-4.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.15%

16.32%

-6.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.17%

18.99%

-5.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.73%

23.74%

-1.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.73%

25.80%

-3.07%

Dividends

RLTY vs. BST - Dividend Comparison

RLTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.45%, less than BST's 9.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BST
BlackRock Science and Technology Trust
9.14%10.36%8.21%8.91%10.57%5.38%3.85%10.52%6.41%4.80%6.69%6.93%
RLTY
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund
8.45%8.98%8.93%9.18%6.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

RLTY vs. BST - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund and BlackRock Science and Technology Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00MJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
157.07M
(RLTY) Total Revenue
(BST) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RLTY and BST have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BST has higher volatility (8.82%) compared to RLTY (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLTY dropped -35.44% vs BST's -47.72%.

BST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RLTY and BST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer