PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RLJ vs. AIPO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RLJ vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RLJ achieves a 69.93% return, which is significantly higher than AIPO's 29.43% return.


RLJ

1D
-0.49%
1M
3.99%
6M
70.39%
YTD
69.93%
1Y
82.55%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
1.03%
10Y*
-1.94%
ALL TIME*
2.14%

AIPO

1D
0.63%
1M
-7.73%
6M
16.62%
YTD
29.43%
1Y
42.03%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
40.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$40.86M$38.41M$47.30M
$19.93M$20.89M$23.64M

RLJ vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
RLJ
RLJ Lodging Trust
69.93%0.73%
AIPO
Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF
29.43%9.46%

Correlation

The correlation between RLJ and AIPO is 0.17, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RLJ vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RLJ
RLJ Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
RLJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
RLJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

AIPO
AIPO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
AIPO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIPO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIPO Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
AIPO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIPO Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RLJ vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RLJAIPODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.19

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.41

1.61

+3.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.35

5.40

+9.96

RLJ vs. AIPO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RLJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.74, which is higher than the AIPO Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RLJ and AIPO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RLJ vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RLJ drawdown since its inception was -83.78%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -24.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLJ and AIPO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLJAIPODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.78%

-24.36%

-59.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.50%

-24.36%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-42.45%

-17.66%

-24.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.44%

-5.28%

-30.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.11%

7.27%

-2.16%

Volatility

RLJ vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for RLJ Lodging Trust (RLJ) is 6.86%, while Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) has a volatility of 14.51%. This indicates that RLJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLJAIPODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

14.51%

-7.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.84%

29.84%

-9.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.67%

37.46%

-8.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.99%

37.20%

-4.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.06%

37.20%

+5.86%

Dividends

RLJ vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison

RLJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIPO
Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF
0.01%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RLJ
RLJ Lodging Trust
4.90%8.05%4.90%3.07%1.13%0.29%0.28%7.45%8.05%6.01%5.39%6.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


RLJ and AIPO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AIPO has higher volatility (14.51%) compared to RLJ (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLJ dropped -83.78% vs AIPO's -24.36%.

RLJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RLJ and AIPO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer