RLGT vs. TUSK
RLGT (Radiant Logistics, Inc.) and TUSK (Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — RLGT in Integrated Freight & Logistics, TUSK in Conglomerates. Over the past 5 years, RLGT returned 4.51%/yr vs -3.15%/yr for TUSK. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RLGT vs. TUSK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RLGT achieves a 45.34% return, which is significantly lower than TUSK's 77.84% return.
RLGT
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 10.98%
- YTD
- 45.34%
- 6M
- 37.72%
- 1Y
- 54.88%
- 3Y*
- 11.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
TUSK
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- 77.84%
- 6M
- 85.88%
- 1Y
- 21.85%
- 3Y*
- -10.70%
- 5Y*
- -3.15%
- 10Y*
- —
RLGT vs. TUSK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLGT Radiant Logistics, Inc. | 45.34% | -5.52% | 0.90% | 30.45% | -30.18% | 25.69% | 4.13% | 31.06% | -7.61% | 17.95% |
TUSK Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. | 77.84% | -38.33% | -32.74% | -48.44% | 375.27% | -59.10% | 102.27% | -87.59% | -7.67% | 29.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between RLGT and TUSK is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2016 | 0.20 |
Fundamentals
RLGT:
$446.58M
TUSK:
$159.01M
RLGT:
$0.33
TUSK:
-$1.47
RLGT:
0.50
TUSK:
2.54
RLGT:
1.91
TUSK:
0.60
RLGT:
$893.50M
TUSK:
$62.70M
RLGT:
$113.69M
TUSK:
$9.65M
RLGT:
$27.72M
TUSK:
-$14.10M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RLGT vs. TUSK — Risk / Return Rank
RLGT
TUSK
RLGT vs. TUSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) and Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RLGT | TUSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.11 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | 0.41 | +2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.51 | 0.74 | +5.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RLGT vs. TUSK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLGT drawdown since its inception was -92.68%, smaller than the maximum TUSK drawdown of -98.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLGT and TUSK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RLGT | TUSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.68% | -98.55% | +5.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.44% | -42.52% | +25.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.53% | -69.27% | +32.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.29% | -80.00% | +36.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -91.77% | +91.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.86% | -73.03% | +40.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.06% | 23.68% | -15.62% |
Volatility
RLGT vs. TUSK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) is 7.86%, while Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) has a volatility of 22.47%. This indicates that RLGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TUSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RLGT | TUSK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.86% | 22.47% | -14.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.32% | 55.18% | -23.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.41% | 66.95% | -28.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.48% | 72.68% | -34.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.12% | 87.23% | -43.11% |
Dividends
RLGT vs. TUSK - Dividend Comparison
Neither RLGT nor TUSK has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLGT Radiant Logistics, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TUSK Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.36% | 1.39% |
Financials
RLGT vs. TUSK - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Radiant Logistics, Inc. and Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RLGT vs. TUSK - Profitability Comparison
RLGT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 214.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
TUSK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 15.78M and revenue of 22.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.6%.
RLGT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.55M and revenue of 214.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.
TUSK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.68M and revenue of 22.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.3%.
RLGT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported a net income of 4.67M and revenue of 214.14M, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
TUSK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. reported a net income of 5.19M and revenue of 22.03M, resulting in a net margin of 23.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RLGT and TUSK have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TUSK has higher volatility (22.47%) compared to RLGT (7.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLGT dropped -92.68% vs TUSK's -98.55%.
RLGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RLGT and TUSK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer