RLGT vs. LULU
RLGT (Radiant Logistics, Inc.) and LULU (Lululemon Athletica Inc.) are both stocks. RLGT operates in Integrated Freight & Logistics (Industrials), while LULU operates in Apparel Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, RLGT returned 10.53%/yr vs 5.37%/yr for LULU. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RLGT vs. LULU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RLGT achieves a 45.34% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -42.85% return. Over the past 10 years, RLGT has outperformed LULU with an annualized return of 10.53%, while LULU has yielded a comparatively lower 5.37% annualized return.
RLGT
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- 10.98%
- YTD
- 45.34%
- 6M
- 37.72%
- 1Y
- 54.88%
- 3Y*
- 11.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.51%
- 10Y*
- 10.53%
LULU
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- -42.85%
- 6M
- -42.05%
- 1Y
- -50.33%
- 3Y*
- -31.43%
- 5Y*
- -18.89%
- 10Y*
- 5.37%
RLGT vs. LULU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RLGT Radiant Logistics, Inc. | 45.34% | -5.52% | 0.90% | 30.45% | -30.18% | 25.69% | 4.13% | 31.06% | -7.61% | 17.95% |
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc. | -42.85% | -45.66% | -25.21% | 59.59% | -18.16% | 12.48% | 50.23% | 90.50% | 54.74% | 20.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between RLGT and LULU is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2007 | 0.16 |
Over the past year, RLGT and LULU have become more correlated (0.36) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
RLGT:
$446.58M
LULU:
$13.72B
RLGT:
$0.33
LULU:
$12.35
RLGT:
27.67
LULU:
9.62
RLGT:
0.99
LULU:
0.47
RLGT:
0.50
LULU:
1.25
RLGT:
1.91
LULU:
2.73
RLGT:
$893.50M
LULU:
$11.20B
RLGT:
$113.69M
LULU:
$6.24B
RLGT:
$27.72M
LULU:
$2.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RLGT vs. LULU — Risk / Return Rank
RLGT
LULU
RLGT vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RLGT | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.54 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.78 | +0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.01 | -0.97 | +3.98 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.51 | -1.72 | +8.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RLGT vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RLGT drawdown since its inception was -92.68%, roughly equal to the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RLGT and LULU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RLGT | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.68% | -92.26% | -0.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.44% | -53.88% | +36.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.53% | -77.66% | +41.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.29% | -77.66% | +34.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.67% | -77.66% | +20.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -76.77% | +76.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.86% | -27.61% | -5.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.06% | 30.26% | -22.20% |
Volatility
RLGT vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Radiant Logistics, Inc. (RLGT) is 7.86%, while Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has a volatility of 13.47%. This indicates that RLGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RLGT | LULU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.86% | 13.47% | -5.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.32% | 32.76% | -1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.41% | 44.48% | -6.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.48% | 42.22% | -3.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.12% | 40.62% | +3.50% |
Dividends
RLGT vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison
Neither RLGT nor LULU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
RLGT vs. LULU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Radiant Logistics, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RLGT vs. LULU - Profitability Comparison
RLGT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 214.14M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LULU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.34B and revenue of 2.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.2%.
RLGT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported an operating income of 6.55M and revenue of 214.14M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.
LULU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported an operating income of 276.95M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.2%.
RLGT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Radiant Logistics, Inc. reported a net income of 4.67M and revenue of 214.14M, resulting in a net margin of 2.2%.
LULU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a net income of 195.05M and revenue of 2.47B, resulting in a net margin of 7.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RLGT and LULU have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LULU has higher volatility (13.47%) compared to RLGT (7.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RLGT dropped -92.68% vs LULU's -92.26%.
RLGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RLGT and LULU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer