PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RL vs. HCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RL vs. HCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and HCI Group, Inc. (HCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RL achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly higher than HCI's -15.87% return. Over the past 10 years, RL has underperformed HCI with an annualized return of 18.35%, while HCI has yielded a comparatively higher 21.75% annualized return.


RL

1D
2.72%
1M
21.82%
YTD
14.56%
6M
9.70%
1Y
52.96%
3Y*
52.12%
5Y*
29.57%
10Y*
18.35%

HCI

1D
-1.03%
1M
4.62%
YTD
-15.87%
6M
-13.97%
1Y
2.02%
3Y*
42.68%
5Y*
14.15%
10Y*
21.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RL vs. HCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
14.56%55.03%62.85%39.82%-8.41%16.66%-10.63%16.07%1.82%17.53%
HCI
HCI Group, Inc.
-15.87%66.27%35.46%126.76%-51.20%62.74%18.45%-6.80%75.98%-21.53%

Correlation

The correlation between RL and HCI is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2008

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RL:

$25.17B

HCI:

$2.07B

EPS

RL:

$15.08

HCI:

$24.40

PE Ratio

RL:

26.79

HCI:

6.58

PEG Ratio

RL:

1.49

HCI:

0.01

PS Ratio

RL:

3.11

HCI:

2.23

PB Ratio

RL:

8.86

HCI:

1.90

Total Revenue (TTM)

RL:

$8.11B

HCI:

$927.48M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RL:

$5.67B

HCI:

$617.14M

EBITDA (TTM)

RL:

$1.18B

HCI:

$459.34M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RL vs. HCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RL
RL Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
RL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
RL Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
RL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
RL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

HCI
HCI Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
HCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCI Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
HCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCI Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RL vs. HCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and HCI Group, Inc. (HCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RLHCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.04

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

0.07

+2.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.65

0.13

+9.53

RL vs. HCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RL Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the HCI Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RL and HCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RL vs. HCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RL drawdown since its inception was -68.62%, smaller than the maximum HCI drawdown of -78.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RL and HCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLHCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.62%

-78.79%

+10.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.67%

-27.46%

+9.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.18%

-28.30%

-7.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.51%

-78.79%

+42.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.14%

-78.79%

+23.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-21.68%

+21.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.11%

-20.67%

-3.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.50%

16.31%

-10.81%

Volatility

RL vs. HCI - Volatility Comparison

Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) has a higher volatility of 16.13% compared to HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) at 7.53%. This indicates that RL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLHCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.13%

7.53%

+8.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.42%

21.38%

+6.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.57%

31.83%

+2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.11%

43.03%

-5.92%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.73%

41.57%

-2.84%

Dividends

RL vs. HCI - Dividend Comparison

RL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than HCI's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HCI
HCI Group, Inc.
1.00%0.83%1.37%1.83%4.04%1.92%3.06%3.50%2.90%4.68%3.04%3.44%
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
0.90%1.01%1.40%2.08%2.78%1.74%0.66%2.29%2.30%1.93%2.21%1.79%

Financials

RL vs. HCI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ralph Lauren Corporation and HCI Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
1.98B
242.88M
(RL) Total Revenue
(HCI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

RL vs. HCI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ralph Lauren Corporation and HCI Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
69.7%
73.0%
Portfolio components
RL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ralph Lauren Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.38B and revenue of 1.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.7%.

HCI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HCI Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 177.28M and revenue of 242.88M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 73.0%.

RL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ralph Lauren Corporation reported an operating income of 156.80M and revenue of 1.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

HCI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HCI Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 115.38M and revenue of 242.88M, resulting in an operating margin of 47.5%.

RL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ralph Lauren Corporation reported a net income of 151.60M and revenue of 1.98B, resulting in a net margin of 7.7%.

HCI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, HCI Group, Inc. reported a net income of 85.04M and revenue of 242.88M, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RL and HCI have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RL has higher volatility (16.13%) compared to HCI (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RL dropped -68.62% vs HCI's -78.79%.

RL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RL and HCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer