PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HCI vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

HCI vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCI achieves a -21.44% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's 10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, HCI has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 19.90%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 13.66% annualized return.


HCI

1D
-1.54%
1M
0.64%
YTD
-21.44%
6M
-16.17%
1Y
-8.31%
3Y*
41.73%
5Y*
14.96%
10Y*
19.90%

^GSPC

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.90%
YTD
10.35%
6M
10.28%
1Y
26.52%
3Y*
20.83%
5Y*
12.30%
10Y*
13.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HCI vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HCI
HCI Group, Inc.
-21.44%66.27%35.46%126.76%-51.20%62.74%18.45%-6.80%75.98%-21.53%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
10.35%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Correlation

The correlation between HCI and ^GSPC is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2008

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HCI vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCI
HCI Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
HCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
HCI Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
HCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
HCI Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCI vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HCI^GSPCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

1.41

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.30

2.93

-3.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.50

13.52

-14.03

HCI vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCI Sharpe Ratio is -0.26, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCI and ^GSPC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HCI^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.26

2.24

-2.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.73

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.76

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.47

+0.07

Drawdowns

HCI vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCI drawdown since its inception was -78.79%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCI and ^GSPC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HCI^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.79%

-56.78%

-22.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.46%

-9.10%

-18.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.30%

-18.90%

-9.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.79%

-25.43%

-53.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.79%

-33.92%

-44.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.87%

-0.74%

-26.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.55%

-10.72%

-9.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.50%

1.97%

+14.53%

Volatility

HCI vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 2.93%. This indicates that HCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HCI^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

2.93%

+4.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.10%

8.99%

+12.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.96%

11.89%

+20.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.06%

16.90%

+26.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.56%

18.06%

+23.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


HCI and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HCI has higher volatility (6.96%) compared to ^GSPC (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HCI dropped -78.79% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.

^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HCI and ^GSPC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer