HCI vs. QQQM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM).

QQQM is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index. It was launched on Oct 13, 2020.

Performance

HCI vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

HCI vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
HCI HCI Group, Inc.	-19.49%	66.27%	35.46%	126.76%	-51.20%	62.74%	12.12%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	-4.75%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	27.45%	6.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HCI achieves a -19.49% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's -4.75% return.

HCI

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: -11.41%
• YTD: -19.49%
• 6M: -17.21%
• 1Y: 5.76%
• 3Y*: 44.44%
• 5Y*: 16.56%
• 10Y*: 19.88%

QQQM

• 1D: 1.24%
• 1M: -3.78%
• YTD: -4.75%
• 6M: -2.87%
• 1Y: 24.28%
• 3Y*: 22.91%
• 5Y*: 13.24%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

HCI vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HCI

HCI Risk / Return Rank: 43
HCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
HCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
HCI Omega Ratio Rank: 39
HCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
HCI Martin Ratio Rank: 44

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 66
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 63
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HCI vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	HCI	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.17	1.09	-0.92
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.49	1.68	-1.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.24	-0.18
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.16	2.02	-1.86
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.31	7.35	-7.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

HCI vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HCI Sharpe Ratio is 0.17, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HCI and QQQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	HCI	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17	1.09	-0.92
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.60	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.64	-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between HCI and QQQM is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

HCI vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

HCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, more than QQQM's 0.53% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HCI HCI Group, Inc.	1.04%	0.83%	1.37%	1.83%	4.04%	1.92%	3.06%	3.50%	2.90%	4.68%	3.04%	3.44%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.53%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

HCI vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HCI drawdown since its inception was -78.79%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HCI and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	HCI	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.79%	-35.04%	-43.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.73%	-12.55%	-14.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-78.79%	-35.04%	-43.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.05%	-7.86%	-17.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.51%	-8.47%	-12.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.29%	3.44%	+9.85%

Volatility

HCI vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

HCI Group, Inc. (HCI) has a higher volatility of 7.70% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 6.58%. This indicates that HCI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	HCI	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.70%	6.58%	+1.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.65%	12.79%	+11.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.93%	22.45%	+11.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.07%	22.24%	+20.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	41.68%	22.26%	+19.42%