PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RL vs. AIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RL vs. AIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and American International Group, Inc. (AIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RL achieves a 14.56% return, which is significantly higher than AIG's -10.94% return. Over the past 10 years, RL has outperformed AIG with an annualized return of 18.35%, while AIG has yielded a comparatively lower 6.00% annualized return.


RL

1D
2.72%
1M
21.82%
YTD
14.56%
6M
9.70%
1Y
52.96%
3Y*
52.12%
5Y*
29.57%
10Y*
18.35%

AIG

1D
0.56%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
-10.94%
6M
-9.79%
1Y
-9.74%
3Y*
12.63%
5Y*
10.27%
10Y*
6.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RL vs. AIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
14.56%55.03%62.85%39.82%-8.41%16.66%-10.63%16.07%1.82%17.53%
AIG
American International Group, Inc.
-10.94%20.03%9.75%9.79%13.76%53.92%-23.08%33.58%-32.09%-6.86%

Correlation

The correlation between RL and AIG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 1997

0.35

The correlation between RL and AIG shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.38 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RL:

$25.17B

AIG:

$41.07B

EPS

RL:

$15.08

AIG:

$4.25

PE Ratio

RL:

26.79

AIG:

17.81

PS Ratio

RL:

3.11

AIG:

2.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

RL:

$8.11B

AIG:

$20.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RL:

$5.67B

AIG:

$7.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

RL:

$1.18B

AIG:

$5.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RL vs. AIG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RL
RL Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
RL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
RL Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
RL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
RL Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

AIG
AIG Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
AIG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AIG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
AIG Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
AIG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
AIG Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RL vs. AIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) and American International Group, Inc. (AIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RLAIGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.94

+0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

-0.58

+3.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.65

-1.02

+10.68

RL vs. AIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RL Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is higher than the AIG Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RL and AIG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RL vs. AIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RL drawdown since its inception was -68.62%, smaller than the maximum AIG drawdown of -99.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RL and AIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RLAIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.62%

-99.64%

+31.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.67%

-16.98%

-0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.18%

-16.98%

-19.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.51%

-26.45%

-10.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-55.14%

-69.58%

+14.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-93.84%

+93.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.11%

-51.23%

+27.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.50%

9.53%

-4.03%

Volatility

RL vs. AIG - Volatility Comparison

Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL) has a higher volatility of 16.13% compared to American International Group, Inc. (AIG) at 6.64%. This indicates that RL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RLAIGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.13%

6.64%

+9.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.42%

17.67%

+9.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.57%

23.69%

+10.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.11%

26.60%

+10.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.73%

32.60%

+6.13%

Dividends

RL vs. AIG - Dividend Comparison

RL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than AIG's 2.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AIG
American International Group, Inc.
2.38%2.05%2.14%2.07%2.02%2.25%3.38%2.49%3.25%2.15%1.96%1.31%
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
0.90%1.01%1.40%2.08%2.78%1.74%0.66%2.29%2.30%1.93%2.21%1.79%

Financials

RL vs. AIG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ralph Lauren Corporation and American International Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
1.98B
0
(RL) Total Revenue
(AIG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RL and AIG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RL has higher volatility (16.13%) compared to AIG (6.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RL dropped -68.62% vs AIG's -99.64%.

RL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.54 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RL and AIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer