RKNG vs. TMH

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RKNG (Defiance Retail Kings ETF) and TMH (Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. RKNG is actively managed, while TMH is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.50, they often move in opposite directions. RKNG charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for TMH.

Performance

RKNG vs. TMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Retail Kings ETF (RKNG) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RKNG

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 12.39%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TMH

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RKNG vs. TMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RKNG Defiance Retail Kings ETF	0.29%
TMH Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged	-5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between RKNG and TMH is -0.50, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	-0.50

Return for Risk

RKNG vs. TMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Retail Kings ETF (RKNG) and Toyota Motor Corporation ADRhedged (TMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RKNG	TMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.86	-5.34	+6.20

Drawdowns

RKNG vs. TMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RKNG drawdown since its inception was -34.21%, which is greater than TMH's maximum drawdown of -5.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKNG and TMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	RKNG	TMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.21%	-5.82%	-28.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.72%	-5.82%	+3.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.80%	-4.54%	-8.26%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RKNG	TMH	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	58.62%	19.92%	+38.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	58.62%	19.92%	+38.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	58.62%	19.92%	+38.70%

RKNG vs. TMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

RKNG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than TMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

RKNG vs. TMH - Dividend Comparison

Neither RKNG nor TMH has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RKNG and TMH in my portfolio?

RKNG and TMH have a correlation of -0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RKNG or TMH?

On fees, TMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RKNG or TMH?

TMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for RKNG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RKNG or TMH?

RKNG and TMH have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between RKNG and TMH?

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for RKNG and 0.19% for TMH.