PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RKLX vs. AMDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RKLX vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKLB ETF (RKLX) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RKLX achieves a 59.46% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 192.40% return.


RKLX

1D
-14.06%
1M
69.79%
YTD
59.46%
6M
247.53%
1Y
535.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDW

1D
4.91%
1M
72.80%
YTD
192.40%
6M
186.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RKLX vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
RKLX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKLB ETF
59.46%38.48%
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
192.40%34.24%

Correlation

The correlation between RKLX and AMDW is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025

0.35

RKLX vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RKLX
AMDW

Industrials

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

28.6%

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

RKLX
100.0%
AMDW

-

Basic Materials

RKLX

-

AMDW

-

Communication Services

RKLX

-

AMDW

-

Consumer Cyclical

RKLX

-

AMDW

-

Consumer Defensive

RKLX

-

AMDW

-

Energy

RKLX

-

AMDW

-

Financial Services

RKLX

-

AMDW

-

Healthcare

RKLX

-

AMDW

-

Real Estate

RKLX

-

AMDW

-

Technology

RKLX

-

AMDW
28.6%

Utilities

RKLX

-

AMDW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RKLX vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RKLX
RKLX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
RKLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RKLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
RKLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
RKLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RKLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RKLX vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKLB ETF (RKLX) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RKLXAMDWDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.12

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.53

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.71

RKLX vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RKLXAMDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.69

4.83

-1.14

Drawdowns

RKLX vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RKLX drawdown since its inception was -71.71%, which is greater than AMDW's maximum drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKLX and AMDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RKLXAMDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.71%

-34.64%

-37.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.20%

0.00%

-44.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.90%

-14.66%

-11.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.65%

Volatility

RKLX vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RKLXAMDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

80.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

142.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

183.57%

81.56%

+102.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

181.89%

81.56%

+100.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

181.89%

81.56%

+100.33%

RKLX vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

RKLX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

RKLX vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

RKLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.37%, less than AMDW's 28.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
28.98%34.78%
RKLX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKLB ETF
9.37%14.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


RKLX and AMDW have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RKLX.

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 28.98%, compared with 9.37% for RKLX.

RKLX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AMDW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RKLX and 0.99% for AMDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RKLX and AMDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer