PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RKLX vs. AMDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RKLX vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKLB ETF (RKLX) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RKLX achieves a 2.51% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 176.01% return.


RKLX

1D
-10.27%
1M
-56.29%
YTD
2.51%
6M
-17.39%
1Y
185.10%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDW

1D
-7.20%
1M
12.58%
YTD
176.01%
6M
174.69%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RKLX vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
RKLX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKLB ETF
2.51%32.91%
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
176.01%36.56%

Correlation

The correlation between RKLX and AMDW is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.36

RKLX vs. AMDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RKLX
AMDW

Industrials

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

27.8%

Utilities

-

-

Industrials

RKLX
100.0%
AMDW

-

Basic Materials

RKLX

-

AMDW

-

Communication Services

RKLX

-

AMDW

-

Consumer Cyclical

RKLX

-

AMDW

-

Consumer Defensive

RKLX

-

AMDW

-

Energy

RKLX

-

AMDW

-

Financial Services

RKLX

-

AMDW

-

Healthcare

RKLX

-

AMDW

-

Real Estate

RKLX

-

AMDW

-

Technology

RKLX

-

AMDW
27.8%

Utilities

RKLX

-

AMDW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RKLX vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RKLX
RKLX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
RKLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RKLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
RKLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
RKLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
RKLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RKLX vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKLB ETF (RKLX) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RKLXAMDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.84

RKLX vs. AMDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RKLX vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RKLX drawdown since its inception was -71.71%, which is greater than AMDW's maximum drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKLX and AMDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RKLXAMDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.71%

-34.64%

-37.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.12%

-7.20%

-56.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.92%

-14.25%

-12.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.42%

Volatility

RKLX vs. AMDW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RKLXAMDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

62.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

142.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

185.83%

83.41%

+102.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

182.53%

83.41%

+99.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

182.53%

83.41%

+99.12%

RKLX vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

RKLX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

RKLX vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

RKLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.58%, less than AMDW's 37.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025
AMDW
Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF
37.14%34.78%
RKLX
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKLB ETF
14.58%14.94%

Frequently Asked Questions


RKLX and AMDW have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMDW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMDW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RKLX.

AMDW has the higher dividend yield at 37.14%, compared with 14.58% for RKLX.

RKLX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while AMDW is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RKLX and 0.99% for AMDW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RKLX and AMDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer