PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RKLX vs. METE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RKLX vs. METE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKLB ETF (RKLX) and Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RKLX is traded in USD, while METE.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the METE.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RKLX achieves a 59.46% return, which is significantly higher than METE.TO's -5.73% return.


RKLX

1D
-14.06%
1M
69.79%
YTD
59.46%
6M
247.53%
1Y
535.41%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

METE.TO

1D
5.05%
1M
2.59%
YTD
-5.73%
6M
-2.48%
1Y
-7.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RKLX vs. METE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RKLX and METE.TO is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2025

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RKLX vs. METE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RKLX
RKLX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
RKLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RKLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
RKLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
RKLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RKLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

METE.TO
METE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
METE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
METE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
METE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
METE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
METE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RKLX vs. METE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKLB ETF (RKLX) and Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RKLXMETE.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.94

-0.19

+3.14

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.12

-0.02

+3.14

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.00

+0.38

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.53

-0.20

+7.73

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.71

-0.43

+15.14

RKLX vs. METE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RKLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is higher than the METE.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RKLX and METE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RKLXMETE.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94

-0.19

+3.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

3.69

-0.03

+3.72

Drawdowns

RKLX vs. METE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RKLX drawdown since its inception was -71.71%, which is greater than METE.TO's maximum drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RKLX and METE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RKLXMETE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.71%

-38.63%

-33.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.71%

-36.03%

-35.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.20%

-22.79%

-21.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.90%

-15.34%

-10.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

36.65%

16.68%

+19.97%

Volatility

RKLX vs. METE.TO - Volatility Comparison

Defiance Daily Target 2X Long RKLB ETF (RKLX) has a higher volatility of 80.64% compared to Harvest Meta Enhanced High Income Shares ETF - Class A Units (METE.TO) at 9.81%. This indicates that RKLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than METE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RKLXMETE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

80.64%

9.81%

+70.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

142.22%

28.78%

+113.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

183.57%

37.12%

+146.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

181.89%

42.60%

+139.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

181.89%

42.60%

+139.29%

RKLX vs. METE.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RKLX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than METE.TO's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

RKLX vs. METE.TO - Dividend Comparison

RKLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.37%, less than METE.TO's 25.77% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


RKLX and METE.TO have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, METE.TO is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

METE.TO is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for RKLX.

RKLX is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while METE.TO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Harvest Portfolios Group. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for RKLX and 0.40% for METE.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RKLX and METE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer