RIVN vs. KMB
RIVN (Rivian Automotive, Inc.) and KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) are both stocks. RIVN operates in Auto Manufacturers (Consumer Cyclical), while KMB operates in Household & Personal Products (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 3 years, RIVN returned 3.20%/yr vs -4.95%/yr for KMB. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
RIVN vs. KMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIVN achieves a -14.97% return, which is significantly lower than KMB's 4.05% return.
RIVN
- 1D
- 7.85%
- 1M
- 21.54%
- YTD
- -14.97%
- 6M
- -9.01%
- 1Y
- 24.89%
- 3Y*
- 3.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KMB
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 4.05%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- -17.99%
- 3Y*
- -4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.92%
- 10Y*
- 0.95%
RIVN vs. KMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIVN Rivian Automotive, Inc. | -14.97% | 48.20% | -43.31% | 27.29% | -82.23% | -2.87% |
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.05% | -19.86% | 11.79% | -7.08% | -1.58% | 8.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between RIVN and KMB is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2021 | 0.01 |
Fundamentals
RIVN:
$20.93B
KMB:
$34.08B
RIVN:
-$2.90
KMB:
$5.93
RIVN:
3.68
KMB:
2.06
RIVN:
4.73
KMB:
18.98
RIVN:
$5.53B
KMB:
$16.54B
RIVN:
$57.00M
KMB:
$5.93B
RIVN:
-$3.18B
KMB:
$3.07B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RIVN vs. KMB — Risk / Return Rank
RIVN
KMB
RIVN vs. KMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) and Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RIVN | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.96 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 0.87 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | -0.67 | +1.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.95 | -1.03 | +1.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RIVN vs. KMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIVN drawdown since its inception was -95.12%, which is greater than KMB's maximum drawdown of -36.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIVN and KMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIVN | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.12% | -36.97% | -58.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.54% | -29.60% | -12.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.61% | -34.06% | -35.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.06% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.26% | -26.52% | -63.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.33% | -8.85% | -77.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.62% | 19.43% | +2.19% |
Volatility
RIVN vs. KMB - Volatility Comparison
Rivian Automotive, Inc. (RIVN) has a higher volatility of 22.66% compared to Kimberly-Clark Corporation (KMB) at 8.42%. This indicates that RIVN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RIVN | KMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.66% | 8.42% | +14.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.82% | 16.67% | +33.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.46% | 25.77% | +39.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 77.55% | 20.19% | +57.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.55% | 21.07% | +56.48% |
Dividends
RIVN vs. KMB - Dividend Comparison
RIVN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMB Kimberly-Clark Corporation | 4.97% | 5.00% | 3.72% | 3.88% | 3.42% | 3.19% | 3.17% | 3.00% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.22% | 2.77% |
RIVN Rivian Automotive, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
RIVN vs. KMB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Rivian Automotive, Inc. and Kimberly-Clark Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RIVN vs. KMB - Profitability Comparison
RIVN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rivian Automotive, Inc. reported a gross profit of 119.00M and revenue of 1.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.6%.
KMB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 4.16B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.9%.
RIVN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rivian Automotive, Inc. reported an operating income of -881.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in an operating margin of -63.8%.
KMB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported an operating income of 753.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in an operating margin of 18.1%.
RIVN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Rivian Automotive, Inc. reported a net income of -416.00M and revenue of 1.38B, resulting in a net margin of -30.1%.
KMB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Kimberly-Clark Corporation reported a net income of 521.00M and revenue of 4.16B, resulting in a net margin of 12.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RIVN and KMB have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RIVN has higher volatility (22.66%) compared to KMB (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIVN dropped -95.12% vs KMB's -36.97%.
RIVN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.31 vs -0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RIVN and KMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer