PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIT.TO vs. VOO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RIT.TO vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Canadian REIT ETF (RIT.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

RIT.TO is traded in CAD, while VOO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VOO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIT.TO achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 12.66% return. Over the past 10 years, RIT.TO has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of 6.65%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.44% annualized return.


RIT.TO

1D
-0.62%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
7.57%
6M
9.98%
1Y
10.62%
3Y*
8.19%
5Y*
3.71%
10Y*
6.65%

VOO

1D
0.00%
1M
7.45%
YTD
12.66%
6M
10.84%
1Y
30.08%
3Y*
23.99%
5Y*
17.22%
10Y*
16.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIT.TO vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIT.TO
CI Canadian REIT ETF
7.57%11.98%2.51%5.37%-20.74%34.36%-6.83%22.86%3.92%11.74%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
12.32%12.42%35.71%23.54%-12.34%27.63%16.32%24.91%3.60%14.02%

Correlation

The correlation between RIT.TO and VOO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010

0.32

The correlation between RIT.TO and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.42 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RIT.TO vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RIT.TO
VOO

Real Estate

96.0%
1.9%

Healthcare

4.0%
8.5%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.2%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.6%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Technology

-

35.7%

Utilities

-

2.4%

Real Estate

RIT.TO
96.0%
VOO
1.9%

Healthcare

RIT.TO
4.0%
VOO
8.5%

Basic Materials

RIT.TO

-

VOO
1.8%

Communication Services

RIT.TO

-

VOO
11.3%

Consumer Cyclical

RIT.TO

-

VOO
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

RIT.TO

-

VOO
4.9%

Energy

RIT.TO

-

VOO
3.5%

Financial Services

RIT.TO

-

VOO
11.6%

Industrials

RIT.TO

-

VOO
8.3%

Technology

RIT.TO

-

VOO
35.7%

Utilities

RIT.TO

-

VOO
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIT.TO vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIT.TO
RIT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
RIT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
RIT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

VOO
VOO Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIT.TO vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Canadian REIT ETF (RIT.TO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RIT.TOVOODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.50

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.48

3.51

-2.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.25

13.34

-9.09

RIT.TO vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIT.TO and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RIT.TOVOODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.01

2.60

-1.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

1.16

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

1.01

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

1.15

-0.63

Drawdowns

RIT.TO vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.72%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -27.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIT.TO and VOO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIT.TOVOODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.72%

-27.65%

-29.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.21%

-8.62%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.16%

-18.93%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.75%

-22.08%

-8.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.90%

-27.65%

-13.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

0.00%

-1.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.81%

-3.24%

-5.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

2.26%

+0.24%

Volatility

RIT.TO vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

CI Canadian REIT ETF (RIT.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.60%. This indicates that RIT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIT.TOVOODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

2.60%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

8.79%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.52%

11.64%

-1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.67%

14.91%

-0.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.46%

16.28%

-0.82%

RIT.TO vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIT.TO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

RIT.TO vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

RIT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than VOO's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RIT.TO
CI Canadian REIT ETF
4.59%4.85%5.17%5.04%5.04%3.82%4.92%4.35%5.11%5.05%5.28%4.79%
VOO
Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
1.03%1.13%1.24%1.46%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.88%2.06%1.78%2.02%2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


RIT.TO and VOO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for RIT.TO.

RIT.TO is categorized as REIT, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: CI Investments and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for RIT.TO and 0.03% for VOO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIT.TO and VOO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer