RIT.TO vs. HGR.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about CI Canadian REIT ETF (RIT.TO) and Harvest Global REIT Leaders Income ETF (HGR.TO).
RIT.TO and HGR.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RIT.TO is an actively managed fund by CI Investments. It was launched on Nov 15, 2004. HGR.TO is an actively managed fund by Harvest. It was launched on Jun 23, 2017.
Performance
RIT.TO vs. HGR.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RIT.TO vs. HGR.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIT.TO CI Canadian REIT ETF | 0.88% | 12.19% | 2.32% | 5.37% | -20.74% | 34.36% | -6.83% | 22.86% | 3.92% | 3.90% |
HGR.TO Harvest Global REIT Leaders Income ETF | -1.57% | -0.91% | 2.46% | 4.01% | -31.59% | 24.87% | -8.27% | 22.05% | -5.71% | 3.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RIT.TO achieves a 0.88% return, which is significantly higher than HGR.TO's -1.57% return.
RIT.TO
- 1D
- 1.34%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 6M
- -0.92%
- 1Y
- 9.83%
- 3Y*
- 5.42%
- 5Y*
- 3.89%
- 10Y*
- 6.54%
HGR.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -8.05%
- YTD
- -1.57%
- 6M
- -5.11%
- 1Y
- -6.27%
- 3Y*
- 1.69%
- 5Y*
- -2.37%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RIT.TO vs. HGR.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
RIT.TO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than HGR.TO's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RIT.TO vs. HGR.TO — Risk / Return Rank
RIT.TO
HGR.TO
RIT.TO vs. HGR.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Canadian REIT ETF (RIT.TO) and Harvest Global REIT Leaders Income ETF (HGR.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RIT.TO | HGR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.76 | -0.43 | +1.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.15 | -0.51 | +1.66 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 0.94 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | -0.53 | +1.76 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.80 | -1.53 | +5.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RIT.TO | HGR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.76 | -0.43 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 | -0.14 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | -0.02 | +0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between RIT.TO and HGR.TO is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RIT.TO vs. HGR.TO - Dividend Comparison
RIT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, less than HGR.TO's 10.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RIT.TO CI Canadian REIT ETF | 4.86% | 4.85% | 5.18% | 5.04% | 5.04% | 3.82% | 4.92% | 4.35% | 5.11% | 5.05% | 5.28% | 4.79% |
HGR.TO Harvest Global REIT Leaders Income ETF | 10.69% | 10.35% | 9.32% | 8.72% | 8.30% | 5.28% | 6.22% | 5.36% | 6.19% | 2.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RIT.TO vs. HGR.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.72%, which is greater than HGR.TO's maximum drawdown of -41.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIT.TO and HGR.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RIT.TO | HGR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.72% | -41.33% | -15.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.45% | -9.87% | +1.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.75% | -41.33% | +10.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.54% | -29.16% | +23.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.86% | -16.67% | +7.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 3.51% | -0.78% |
Volatility
RIT.TO vs. HGR.TO - Volatility Comparison
CI Canadian REIT ETF (RIT.TO) has a higher volatility of 4.09% compared to Harvest Global REIT Leaders Income ETF (HGR.TO) at 3.14%. This indicates that RIT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HGR.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RIT.TO | HGR.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.09% | 3.14% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.01% | 10.23% | -2.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.94% | 14.69% | -1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.66% | 16.77% | -2.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.43% | 18.39% | -2.96% |