RIT.TO vs. DGRC.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

RIT.TO (CI Canadian REIT ETF) and DGRC.TO (CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RIT.TO is a REIT fund actively managed by CI Investments, while DGRC.TO is a Dividend fund managed by CI Investments. Over the past 5 years, RIT.TO returned 3.71%/yr vs 12.71%/yr for DGRC.TO. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RIT.TO charges 0.87%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for DGRC.TO.

Performance

RIT.TO vs. DGRC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Canadian REIT ETF (RIT.TO) and CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIT.TO achieves a 7.57% return, which is significantly lower than DGRC.TO's 14.54% return.

RIT.TO

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: -0.30%
• YTD: 7.57%
• 6M: 9.98%
• 1Y: 10.62%
• 3Y*: 8.19%
• 5Y*: 3.71%
• 10Y*: 6.65%

DGRC.TO

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 14.54%
• 6M: 14.94%
• 1Y: 32.94%
• 3Y*: 20.12%
• 5Y*: 12.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIT.TO vs. DGRC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RIT.TO CI Canadian REIT ETF	7.57%	11.98%	2.51%	5.37%	-20.74%	34.36%	-6.83%	22.86%	6.61%
DGRC.TO CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF	14.54%	27.20%	12.36%	7.79%	-1.70%	20.84%	7.22%	18.60%	-3.85%

Correlation

The correlation between RIT.TO and DGRC.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.44
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2018	0.50

The correlation between RIT.TO and DGRC.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (1 year) to 0.51 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RIT.TO vs. DGRC.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RIT.TO	DGRC.TO
Real Estate	96.0%	0.1%
Healthcare	4.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	8.0%
Communication Services	-	1.7%
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	10.7%
Energy	-	27.7%
Financial Services	-	24.3%
Industrials	-	16.1%
Technology	-	1.2%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

RIT.TO vs. DGRC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIT.TO

RIT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 29
RIT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
RIT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
RIT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 26
RIT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
RIT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 30

DGRC.TO

DGRC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 88
DGRC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
DGRC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
DGRC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
DGRC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
DGRC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIT.TO vs. DGRC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Canadian REIT ETF (RIT.TO) and CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RIT.TO	DGRC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.01	2.86	-1.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.53	3.88	-2.35
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.52	-0.34
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.48	5.52	-4.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.25	20.77	-16.52
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RIT.TO vs. DGRC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIT.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the DGRC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIT.TO and DGRC.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RIT.TO	DGRC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.01	2.86	-1.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	1.03	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.82	-0.30

Drawdowns

RIT.TO vs. DGRC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIT.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.72%, which is greater than DGRC.TO's maximum drawdown of -36.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIT.TO and DGRC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	RIT.TO	DGRC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.72%	-36.59%	-20.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.21%	-5.99%	-1.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.16%	-12.90%	-4.26%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.75%	-15.39%	-15.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.31%	-0.15%	-1.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.81%	-3.20%	-5.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.50%	1.59%	+0.91%

Volatility

RIT.TO vs. DGRC.TO - Volatility Comparison

CI Canadian REIT ETF (RIT.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF (DGRC.TO) at 2.59%. This indicates that RIT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RIT.TO	DGRC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.92%	2.59%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.92%	9.16%	-1.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.52%	11.58%	-1.06%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.67%	12.47%	+2.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.46%	14.73%	+0.73%

RIT.TO vs. DGRC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

RIT.TO has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRC.TO's 0.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

RIT.TO vs. DGRC.TO - Dividend Comparison

RIT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than DGRC.TO's 2.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGRC.TO CI Canada Quality Dividend Growth Index ETF	2.41%	2.58%	2.46%	2.56%	2.48%	1.87%	3.06%	2.20%	1.63%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RIT.TO CI Canadian REIT ETF	4.59%	4.85%	5.17%	5.04%	5.04%	3.82%	4.92%	4.35%	5.11%	5.05%	5.28%	4.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RIT.TO and DGRC.TO in my portfolio?

RIT.TO and DGRC.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RIT.TO or DGRC.TO?

On fees, DGRC.TO is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RIT.TO or DGRC.TO?

DGRC.TO is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for RIT.TO.

What is the main difference between RIT.TO and DGRC.TO?

RIT.TO is categorized as REIT, while DGRC.TO is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.87% for RIT.TO and 0.23% for DGRC.TO.