PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIOT vs. FSM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RIOT vs. FSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) and Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIOT achieves a 110.02% return, which is significantly higher than FSM's -8.97% return. Over the past 10 years, RIOT has outperformed FSM with an annualized return of 24.63%, while FSM has yielded a comparatively lower 3.63% annualized return.


RIOT

1D
1.80%
1M
13.28%
YTD
110.02%
6M
73.92%
1Y
173.77%
3Y*
37.39%
5Y*
-3.03%
10Y*
24.63%

FSM

1D
3.72%
1M
-6.49%
YTD
-8.97%
6M
-8.69%
1Y
29.80%
3Y*
38.24%
5Y*
6.23%
10Y*
3.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIOT vs. FSM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.
110.02%24.09%-34.00%356.34%-84.82%31.43%1,416.96%-25.83%-94.68%729.34%
FSM
Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.
-8.97%128.67%11.14%2.93%-3.85%-52.67%101.96%12.09%-30.27%-7.61%

Correlation

The correlation between RIOT and FSM is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2007

0.14

The correlation between RIOT and FSM shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

RIOT:

$9.25B

FSM:

$2.97B

EPS

RIOT:

-$2.35

FSM:

$1.06

PS Ratio

RIOT:

15.01

FSM:

2.61

PB Ratio

RIOT:

3.86

FSM:

1.68

Total Revenue (TTM)

RIOT:

$653.27M

FSM:

$1.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

RIOT:

$179.76M

FSM:

$598.05M

EBITDA (TTM)

RIOT:

-$482.33M

FSM:

$743.42M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIOT vs. FSM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIOT
RIOT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
RIOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIOT Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
RIOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIOT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FSM
FSM Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIOT vs. FSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) and Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIOTFSMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.13

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

0.73

+2.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.58

1.87

+4.71

RIOT vs. FSM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIOT Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the FSM Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIOT and FSM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIOT vs. FSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIOT drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, which is greater than FSM's maximum drawdown of -92.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIOT and FSM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIOTFSMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-92.25%

-7.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.57%

-40.78%

-7.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.00%

-40.78%

-28.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.55%

-67.09%

-25.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.32%

-81.07%

-17.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.17%

-34.63%

-64.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-87.83%

-45.15%

-42.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.51%

15.94%

+8.57%

Volatility

RIOT vs. FSM - Volatility Comparison

Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) has a higher volatility of 20.07% compared to Fortuna Silver Mines Inc. (FSM) at 18.09%. This indicates that RIOT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIOTFSMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.07%

18.09%

+1.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.16%

45.78%

+16.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.24%

57.67%

+26.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.82%

57.48%

+36.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

112.15%

59.50%

+52.65%

Dividends

RIOT vs. FSM - Dividend Comparison

Neither RIOT nor FSM has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FSM
Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.52%

Financials

RIOT vs. FSM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Riot Platforms, Inc. and Fortuna Silver Mines Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00M20222023202420252026
167.22M
342.47M
(RIOT) Total Revenue
(FSM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RIOT and FSM have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RIOT has higher volatility (20.07%) compared to FSM (18.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIOT dropped -99.98% vs FSM's -92.25%.

RIOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 0.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIOT and FSM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer