PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RIOT vs. CLSK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

RIOT vs. CLSK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RIOT achieves a 126.44% return, which is significantly higher than CLSK's 69.86% return. Over the past 10 years, RIOT has outperformed CLSK with an annualized return of 24.91%, while CLSK has yielded a comparatively lower -6.17% annualized return.


RIOT

1D
0.21%
1M
17.15%
YTD
126.44%
6M
109.88%
1Y
209.49%
3Y*
35.24%
5Y*
-3.35%
10Y*
24.91%

CLSK

1D
-1.49%
1M
7.64%
YTD
69.86%
6M
49.35%
1Y
94.24%
3Y*
55.29%
5Y*
0.69%
10Y*
-6.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RIOT vs. CLSK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.
126.44%24.09%-34.00%356.34%-84.82%31.43%1,416.96%-25.83%-94.68%729.34%
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
69.86%9.88%-16.50%440.69%-78.57%-67.23%442.99%-73.90%-15.98%-30.29%

Correlation

The correlation between RIOT and CLSK is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2016

0.47

Over the past year, RIOT and CLSK have become more correlated (0.76) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

EPS

RIOT:

-$2.35

CLSK:

-$2.24

PS Ratio

RIOT:

16.19

CLSK:

5.19

Total Revenue (TTM)

RIOT:

$653.27M

CLSK:

$739.88M

Gross Profit (TTM)

RIOT:

$179.76M

CLSK:

$306.93M

EBITDA (TTM)

RIOT:

-$482.33M

CLSK:

-$103.41M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RIOT vs. CLSK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RIOT
RIOT Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
RIOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RIOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
RIOT Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
RIOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
RIOT Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

CLSK
CLSK Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CLSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSK Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSK Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RIOT vs. CLSK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) and CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RIOTCLSKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.22

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.34

1.46

+2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.59

2.42

+6.18

RIOT vs. CLSK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RIOT Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is higher than the CLSK Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RIOT and CLSK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RIOT vs. CLSK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RIOT drawdown since its inception was -99.98%, roughly equal to the maximum CLSK drawdown of -98.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RIOT and CLSK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RIOTCLSKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

-98.56%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.57%

-64.74%

+16.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-69.00%

-71.28%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.55%

-92.00%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.32%

-98.56%

+0.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.10%

-76.45%

-22.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-87.85%

-69.77%

-18.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.49%

39.15%

-14.66%

Volatility

RIOT vs. CLSK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Riot Platforms, Inc. (RIOT) is 18.61%, while CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) has a volatility of 20.61%. This indicates that RIOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLSK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RIOTCLSKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.61%

20.61%

-2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.82%

60.33%

+0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

83.62%

88.39%

-4.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.65%

100.73%

-7.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

112.18%

183.32%

-71.14%

Dividends

RIOT vs. CLSK - Dividend Comparison

Neither RIOT nor CLSK has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RIOT
Riot Platforms, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.52%

Financials

RIOT vs. CLSK - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Riot Platforms, Inc. and CleanSpark, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20222023202420252026
167.22M
136.41M
(RIOT) Total Revenue
(CLSK) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


RIOT and CLSK have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLSK has higher volatility (20.61%) compared to RIOT (18.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RIOT dropped -99.98% vs CLSK's -98.56%.

RIOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RIOT and CLSK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer