RINT vs. RODM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RINT (Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF) and RODM (Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. RINT is actively managed, while RODM is passively managed. Over the past year, RINT returned 22.58% vs 24.04% for RODM. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RINT charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for RODM.

Performance

RINT vs. RODM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RINT achieves a 8.14% return, which is significantly lower than RODM's 10.16% return.

RINT

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 8.14%
• 6M: 8.01%
• 1Y: 22.58%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RODM

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -1.81%
• YTD: 10.16%
• 6M: 9.75%
• 1Y: 24.04%
• 3Y*: 20.17%
• 5Y*: 9.67%
• 10Y*: 9.31%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RINT vs. RODM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RINT Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF	8.14%	15.69%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	10.16%	17.14%

Correlation

The correlation between RINT and RODM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025	0.85

The correlation between RINT and RODM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RINT vs. RODM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RINT

RINT Risk / Return Rank: 46
RINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
RINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
RINT Omega Ratio Rank: 46
RINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
RINT Martin Ratio Rank: 47

RODM

RODM Risk / Return Rank: 74
RODM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
RODM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
RODM Omega Ratio Rank: 73
RODM Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
RODM Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RINT vs. RODM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) and Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RINT	RODM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	2.21	-0.72
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	3.12	-1.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.40	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.90	3.40	-1.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.15	13.45	-6.30

RINT vs. RODM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is lower than the RODM Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RINT and RODM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RINT vs. RODM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RINT drawdown since its inception was -11.91%, smaller than the maximum RODM drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINT and RODM.

Drawdown Indicators

	RINT	RODM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.91%	-35.98%	+24.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.91%	-7.10%	-4.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-10.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.85%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.98%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.68%	-2.16%	+0.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.78%	-6.36%	+4.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	1.79%	+1.37%

Volatility

RINT vs. RODM - Volatility Comparison

Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) has a higher volatility of 4.85% compared to Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF (RODM) at 3.21%. This indicates that RINT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RODM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RINT	RODM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.85%	3.21%	+1.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.03%	8.77%	+4.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.27%	10.95%	+4.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.93%	13.45%	+1.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.93%	15.08%	-0.15%

RINT vs. RODM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINT has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than RODM's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

RINT vs. RODM - Dividend Comparison

RINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%, less than RODM's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RINT Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF	0.82%	0.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RODM Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF	2.82%	3.11%	4.09%	4.42%	3.81%	4.41%	2.82%	2.82%	2.03%	2.24%	3.19%	2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RINT and RODM in my portfolio?

RINT and RODM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RINT or RODM?

RINT has higher volatility (4.85%) compared to RODM (3.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINT dropped -11.91% vs RODM's -35.98%.

Which ETF is better, RINT or RODM?

On 1-year performance, RODM leads with 24.04% vs 22.58% for RINT. On fees, RODM is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, RODM has been the lower-risk option at 3.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RINT or RODM?

Over the 1-year period, RODM has performed better with a 24.04% return vs 22.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RINT or RODM?

RODM is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for RINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RINT or RODM?

RODM has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 0.82% for RINT.

What is the main difference between RINT and RODM?

They also come from different issuers: Russell and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for RINT and 0.29% for RODM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RODM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.