RINT vs. PATN

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

RINT (Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF) and PATN (Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. RINT is actively managed, while PATN is passively managed. Over the past year, RINT returned 25.05% vs 53.28% for PATN. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. RINT charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PATN.

Performance

RINT vs. PATN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RINT achieves a 11.48% return, which is significantly lower than PATN's 28.74% return.

RINT

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 1.79%
• 6M: 6.25%
• YTD: 11.48%
• 1Y: 25.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.16%

PATN

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: -3.34%
• 6M: 17.25%
• YTD: 28.74%
• 1Y: 53.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 35.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	$6.30M	$4.83M	$3.83M
RINT Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF	$631.20K	$544.70K	$524.60K

RINT vs. PATN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RINT Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF	11.48%	15.69%
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	28.74%	25.93%

Correlation

The correlation between RINT and PATN is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2025	0.82

The correlation between RINT and PATN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RINT vs. PATN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RINT

RINT Risk / Return Rank: 61
RINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
RINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
RINT Omega Ratio Rank: 62
RINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
RINT Martin Ratio Rank: 61

PATN

PATN Risk / Return Rank: 83
PATN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PATN Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
PATN Omega Ratio Rank: 83
PATN Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
PATN Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RINT vs. PATN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) and Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RINT	PATN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	2.11	-0.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	2.71	-0.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.38	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.11	3.72	-1.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.01	11.66	-3.65

RINT vs. PATN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the PATN Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RINT and PATN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RINT vs. PATN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RINT drawdown since its inception was -11.91%, smaller than the maximum PATN drawdown of -16.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINT and PATN.

Drawdown Indicators

	RINT	PATN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.91%	-16.77%	+4.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.91%	-14.40%	+2.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-9.34%	+9.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.73%	-3.44%	+1.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.13%	4.58%	-1.45%

Volatility

RINT vs. PATN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF (RINT) is 4.48%, while Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF (PATN) has a volatility of 8.80%. This indicates that RINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PATN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RINT	PATN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.48%	8.80%	-4.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.42%	22.85%	-9.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.45%	25.38%	-9.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.88%	22.70%	-7.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.88%	22.70%	-7.82%

RINT vs. PATN - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINT has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than PATN's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

RINT vs. PATN - Dividend Comparison

RINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, less than PATN's 1.69% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
PATN Pacer Nasdaq International Patent Leaders ETF	1.69%	2.25%	0.30%
RINT Russell Investments International Developed Equity ETF	0.80%	0.89%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RINT and PATN in my portfolio?

RINT and PATN have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RINT or PATN?

PATN has higher volatility (8.80%) compared to RINT (4.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINT dropped -11.91% vs PATN's -16.77%.

Which ETF is better, RINT or PATN?

On 1-year performance, PATN leads with 53.28% vs 25.05% for RINT. On fees, RINT is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, RINT has been the lower-risk option at 4.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RINT or PATN?

Over the 1-year period, PATN has performed better with a 53.28% return vs 25.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RINT or PATN?

RINT is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PATN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RINT or PATN?

PATN has the higher dividend yield at 1.69%, compared with 0.80% for RINT.

What is the main difference between RINT and PATN?

They also come from different issuers: Russell and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for RINT and 0.65% for PATN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PATN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.