RING vs. SOXX
RING (iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF) and SOXX (iShares Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RING is a Gold fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index, while SOXX is a Semiconductors fund tracking the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RING returned 12.92%/yr vs 36.08%/yr for SOXX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RING charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SOXX.
Performance
RING vs. SOXX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RING achieves a -8.53% return, which is significantly lower than SOXX's 100.58% return. Over the past 10 years, RING has underperformed SOXX with an annualized return of 12.92%, while SOXX has yielded a comparatively higher 36.08% annualized return.
RING
- 1D
- -4.54%
- 1M
- -9.24%
- YTD
- -8.53%
- 6M
- -13.08%
- 1Y
- 52.30%
- 3Y*
- 44.79%
- 5Y*
- 20.81%
- 10Y*
- 12.92%
SOXX
- 1D
- -7.88%
- 1M
- 12.35%
- YTD
- 100.58%
- 6M
- 98.07%
- 1Y
- 167.63%
- 3Y*
- 56.18%
- 5Y*
- 33.69%
- 10Y*
- 36.08%
RING vs. SOXX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | -8.53% | 164.72% | 15.98% | 12.29% | -15.40% | -7.46% | 24.98% | 49.92% | -13.14% | 10.24% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 100.58% | 40.74% | 12.92% | 67.12% | -35.09% | 44.09% | 52.72% | 62.42% | -6.49% | 39.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between RING and SOXX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012 | 0.15 |
The correlation between RING and SOXX shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RING vs. SOXX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RING
SOXX
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
RING
SOXX
-
Financial Services
RING
SOXX
-
Communication Services
RING
-
SOXX
-
Consumer Cyclical
RING
-
SOXX
-
Consumer Defensive
RING
-
SOXX
-
Energy
RING
-
SOXX
-
Healthcare
RING
-
SOXX
-
Industrials
RING
-
SOXX
-
Real Estate
RING
-
SOXX
-
Technology
RING
-
SOXX
Utilities
RING
-
SOXX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RING vs. SOXX — Risk / Return Rank
RING
SOXX
RING vs. SOXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RING | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.60 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 10.70 | -9.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.91 | 38.46 | -34.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RING vs. SOXX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RING drawdown since its inception was -79.47%, which is greater than SOXX's maximum drawdown of -70.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RING and SOXX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RING | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.47% | -70.21% | -9.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.72% | -15.77% | -19.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.72% | -41.36% | +5.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.94% | -45.75% | -2.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.04% | -45.75% | -6.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.25% | -7.88% | -24.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.33% | -19.94% | -27.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.40% | 4.38% | +9.02% |
Volatility
RING vs. SOXX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) is 17.22%, while iShares Semiconductor ETF (SOXX) has a volatility of 22.75%. This indicates that RING experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RING | SOXX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.22% | 22.75% | -5.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.95% | 33.44% | +6.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.04% | 39.42% | +8.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.94% | 37.21% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.73% | 34.00% | +2.73% |
RING vs. SOXX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RING has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
RING vs. SOXX - Dividend Comparison
RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than SOXX's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 1.35% | 0.84% | 1.43% | 2.01% | 2.29% | 2.38% | 0.83% | 0.83% | 0.70% | 0.42% | 1.41% | 0.96% |
SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | 0.24% | 0.57% | 0.67% | 0.78% | 1.26% | 0.64% | 0.81% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 0.90% | 1.08% | 1.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RING and SOXX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXX has higher volatility (22.75%) compared to RING (17.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RING dropped -79.47% vs SOXX's -70.21%.
On 10-year performance, SOXX leads with 36.08% vs 12.92% for RING. On fees, SOXX is cheaper at 0.34% per year. On volatility, RING has been the lower-risk option at 17.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXX has performed better with a 36.08% return vs 12.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXX is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RING.
RING has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.24% for SOXX.
RING is categorized as Gold, while SOXX is Semiconductors. RING tracks MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index, while SOXX tracks NYSE Semiconductor Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RING and 0.34% for SOXX.
SOXX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.28 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RING and SOXX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer