PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RING vs. GOEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RING vs. GOEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RING achieves a -8.53% return, which is significantly higher than GOEX's -10.87% return. Over the past 10 years, RING has outperformed GOEX with an annualized return of 12.92%, while GOEX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.97% annualized return.


RING

1D
-4.54%
1M
-9.24%
YTD
-8.53%
6M
-13.08%
1Y
52.30%
3Y*
44.79%
5Y*
20.81%
10Y*
12.92%

GOEX

1D
-4.76%
1M
-7.11%
YTD
-10.87%
6M
-15.49%
1Y
57.11%
3Y*
46.70%
5Y*
19.54%
10Y*
11.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RING vs. GOEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
-8.53%164.72%15.98%12.29%-15.40%-7.46%24.98%49.92%-13.14%10.24%
GOEX
Global X Gold Explorers ETF
-10.87%179.50%19.38%1.99%-14.63%-14.45%34.98%36.73%-14.84%12.61%

Correlation

The correlation between RING and GOEX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2012

0.89

The correlation between RING and GOEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

RING vs. GOEX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RING
GOEX

Basic Materials

99.7%
100.0%

Financial Services

0.1%

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

0.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

RING
99.7%
GOEX
100.0%

Financial Services

RING
0.1%
GOEX

-

Communication Services

RING

-

GOEX

-

Consumer Cyclical

RING

-

GOEX

-

Consumer Defensive

RING

-

GOEX

-

Energy

RING

-

GOEX

-

Healthcare

RING

-

GOEX

-

Industrials

RING

-

GOEX
0.1%

Real Estate

RING

-

GOEX

-

Technology

RING

-

GOEX

-

Utilities

RING

-

GOEX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RING vs. GOEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RING
RING Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
RING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RING Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
RING Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
RING Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
RING Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

GOEX
GOEX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GOEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOEX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
GOEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOEX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RING vs. GOEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RINGGOEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.21

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.47

1.45

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.91

3.84

+0.07

RING vs. GOEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RING Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is comparable to the GOEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RING and GOEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RING vs. GOEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RING drawdown since its inception was -79.47%, smaller than the maximum GOEX drawdown of -88.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RING and GOEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RINGGOEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.47%

-88.83%

+9.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.72%

-39.64%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.72%

-39.64%

+3.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.94%

-47.16%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.04%

-53.66%

+1.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.25%

-34.22%

+1.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.33%

-63.47%

+16.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.40%

14.92%

-1.52%

Volatility

RING vs. GOEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) is 17.22%, while Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) has a volatility of 18.46%. This indicates that RING experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RINGGOEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.22%

18.46%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.95%

42.70%

-2.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.04%

51.52%

-3.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.94%

39.57%

-2.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.73%

40.17%

-3.44%

RING vs. GOEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RING has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GOEX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

RING vs. GOEX - Dividend Comparison

RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than GOEX's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOEX
Global X Gold Explorers ETF
2.33%2.08%2.46%0.05%1.04%2.35%2.62%1.60%0.00%0.00%38.91%11.70%
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
1.35%0.84%1.43%2.01%2.29%2.38%0.83%0.83%0.70%0.42%1.41%0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, RING and GOEX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GOEX has higher volatility (18.46%) compared to RING (17.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RING dropped -79.47% vs GOEX's -88.83%.

On 10-year performance, RING leads with 12.92% vs 11.97% for GOEX. On fees, RING is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, RING has been the lower-risk option at 17.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RING has performed better with a 12.92% return vs 11.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RING is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for GOEX.

GOEX has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 1.35% for RING.

RING tracks MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index, while GOEX tracks Solactive Global Gold Explorers & Developers Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RING and 0.65% for GOEX.

GOEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RING and GOEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer