PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RING vs. ETON
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RING vs. ETON - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc (ETON). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RING achieves a -5.54% return, which is significantly lower than ETON's 86.81% return.


RING

1D
3.20%
1M
-16.79%
YTD
-5.54%
6M
-4.18%
1Y
56.55%
3Y*
44.87%
5Y*
18.76%
10Y*
13.85%

ETON

1D
-1.62%
1M
2.50%
YTD
86.81%
6M
89.16%
1Y
117.71%
3Y*
102.22%
5Y*
36.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RING vs. ETON - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
-5.54%164.72%15.98%12.29%-15.40%-7.46%24.98%49.92%13.18%
ETON
Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc
86.81%26.95%204.11%55.32%-34.27%-47.23%12.92%17.65%-4.23%

Correlation

The correlation between RING and ETON is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2018

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RING vs. ETON — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RING
RING Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
RING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RING Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
RING Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
RING Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
RING Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

ETON
ETON Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ETON Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETON Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETON Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ETON Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETON Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RING vs. ETON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc (ETON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RINGETONDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.36

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.59

3.27

-1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.45

6.73

-2.28

RING vs. ETON - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RING Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is lower than the ETON Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RING and ETON, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RING vs. ETON - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RING drawdown since its inception was -79.47%, roughly equal to the maximum ETON drawdown of -79.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RING and ETON.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RINGETONDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.47%

-79.94%

+0.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.72%

-36.17%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.72%

-45.65%

+9.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.94%

-70.42%

+22.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.03%

-9.74%

-20.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.36%

-37.58%

-9.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.74%

17.56%

-4.82%

Volatility

RING vs. ETON - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) and Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc (ETON) have volatilities of 16.83% and 17.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RINGETONDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.83%

17.63%

-0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.11%

40.49%

-1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.31%

54.85%

-7.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.81%

63.41%

-26.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.70%

63.87%

-27.17%

Dividends

RING vs. ETON - Dividend Comparison

RING's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, while ETON has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETON
Eton Pharmaceuticals Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RING
iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF
0.89%0.84%1.43%2.01%2.29%2.38%0.83%0.83%0.70%0.42%1.41%0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


RING and ETON have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETON has higher volatility (17.63%) compared to RING (16.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RING dropped -79.47% vs ETON's -79.94%.

ETON currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RING and ETON

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer