RINF vs. VTP
RINF (ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF) and VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - RINF tracks the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index while VTP tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. RINF charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTP.
Performance
RINF vs. VTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RINF achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly higher than VTP's 1.55% return.
RINF
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 3.08%
- 1Y
- 2.48%
- 3Y*
- 4.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.43%
- 10Y*
- 4.69%
VTP
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RINF vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 2.37% | 0.34% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.55% | 2.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between RINF and VTP is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RINF vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank
RINF
VTP
RINF vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RINF | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RINF | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 1.31 | -1.23 |
Drawdowns
RINF vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RINF drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, which is greater than VTP's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINF and VTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RINF | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -1.92% | -41.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.60% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.30% | -0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.45% | -0.52% | -15.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.37% | — | — |
Volatility
RINF vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RINF | VTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.19% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.77% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.49% | 3.26% | +1.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.82% | 3.26% | +9.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.57% | 3.26% | +9.31% |
RINF vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
RINF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
RINF vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison
RINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than VTP's 1.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.70% | 3.89% | 4.68% | 5.07% | 1.15% | 2.76% | 0.82% | 1.90% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 1.09% | 1.83% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.61% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RINF and VTP have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RINF.
RINF has the higher dividend yield at 3.70%, compared with 1.61% for VTP.
RINF tracks FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index, while VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RINF and 0.05% for VTP.
Find the right allocation for RINF and VTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer