RINF vs. VTP

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

RINF (ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF) and VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - RINF tracks the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index while VTP tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, RINF returned 1.25% vs 3.57% for VTP. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. RINF charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VTP.

Performance

RINF vs. VTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RINF achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly higher than VTP's 0.94% return.

RINF

• 1D: -0.46%
• 1M: -0.44%
• 6M: 1.87%
• YTD: 1.79%
• 1Y: 1.25%
• 3Y*: 3.84%
• 5Y*: 5.68%
• 10Y*: 4.61%

VTP

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: -0.56%
• 6M: 0.57%
• YTD: 0.94%
• 1Y: 3.57%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RINF vs. VTP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF	1.79%	0.02%
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF	0.94%	2.46%

Correlation

The correlation between RINF and VTP is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025	-0.16

Return for Risk

RINF vs. VTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RINF

RINF Risk / Return Rank: 14
RINF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
RINF Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
RINF Omega Ratio Rank: 12
RINF Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
RINF Martin Ratio Rank: 14

VTP

VTP Risk / Return Rank: 38
VTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
VTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
VTP Omega Ratio Rank: 34
VTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
VTP Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RINF vs. VTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RINF	VTP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.29	1.07	-0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.44	1.57	-1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.19	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.48	1.87	-1.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.88	5.30	-4.42

RINF vs. VTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RINF Sharpe Ratio is 0.29, which is lower than the VTP Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RINF and VTP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RINF vs. VTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RINF drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, which is greater than VTP's maximum drawdown of -1.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINF and VTP.

Drawdown Indicators

	RINF	VTP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.51%	-1.92%	-41.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.60%	-1.92%	-0.68%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.18%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.22%	-0.89%	-0.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.33%	-0.53%	-15.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.42%	0.68%	+0.74%

Volatility

RINF vs. VTP - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) and Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) have volatilities of 1.20% and 1.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RINF	VTP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.20%	1.19%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.97%	2.47%	+0.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.31%	3.36%	+0.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.62%	3.34%	+9.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.54%	3.34%	+9.20%

RINF vs. VTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

RINF has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VTP's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

RINF vs. VTP - Dividend Comparison

RINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, more than VTP's 2.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF	3.68%	3.89%	4.68%	5.07%	1.15%	2.76%	0.82%	1.90%	2.47%	2.99%	1.09%	1.83%
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF	2.98%	1.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RINF and VTP in my portfolio?

RINF and VTP have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RINF or VTP?

RINF has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to VTP (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINF dropped -43.51% vs VTP's -1.92%.

Which ETF is better, RINF or VTP?

On 1-year performance, VTP leads with 3.57% vs 1.25% for RINF. On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RINF or VTP?

Over the 1-year period, VTP has performed better with a 3.57% return vs 1.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RINF or VTP?

VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RINF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RINF or VTP?

RINF has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 2.98% for VTP.

What is the main difference between RINF and VTP?

RINF tracks FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index, while VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RINF and 0.05% for VTP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VTP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.