RINF vs. VRIG
RINF (ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF) and VRIG (Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RINF is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the FTSE 30-Year TIPS (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index, while VRIG is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Invesco. RINF is passively managed, while VRIG is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RINF returned 4.84%/yr vs 4.49%/yr for VRIG. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.
Performance
RINF vs. VRIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RINF achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than VRIG's 2.14% return.
RINF
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- -0.10%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 0.96%
- 3Y*
- 3.52%
- 5Y*
- 4.84%
- 10Y*
- 4.53%
VRIG
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 2.14%
- 6M
- 2.25%
- 1Y
- 4.94%
- 3Y*
- 5.95%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- —
RINF vs. VRIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | -0.10% | 1.64% | 9.79% | 0.21% | 8.77% | 16.20% | 1.98% | 1.82% | -0.79% | -1.70% |
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 2.14% | 5.05% | 6.81% | 7.37% | 0.99% | 1.06% | 1.76% | 4.57% | 0.51% | 3.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between RINF and VRIG is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2016 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RINF vs. VRIG — Risk / Return Rank
RINF
VRIG
RINF vs. VRIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) and Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RINF | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -24.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 5.34 | -4.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.31 | 62.12 | -61.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.69 | 317.44 | -316.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RINF vs. VRIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RINF drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, which is greater than VRIG's maximum drawdown of -13.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RINF and VRIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RINF | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.51% | -13.04% | -30.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.06% | -0.08% | -2.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.62% | -0.78% | -8.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.58% | -2.28% | -11.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.06% | 0.00% | -3.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.39% | -0.27% | -16.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.39% | 0.02% | +1.37% |
Volatility
RINF vs. VRIG - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF (RINF) has a higher volatility of 1.55% compared to Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF (VRIG) at 0.12%. This indicates that RINF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RINF | VRIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.55% | 0.12% | +1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.15% | 0.36% | +2.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.52% | 0.49% | +4.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.74% | 1.29% | +11.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.56% | 3.79% | +8.77% |
RINF vs. VRIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both RINF and VRIG have an expense ratio of 0.30%.
Dividends
RINF vs. VRIG - Dividend Comparison
RINF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, less than VRIG's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RINF ProShares Inflation Expectations ETF | 3.79% | 3.89% | 4.68% | 5.07% | 1.15% | 2.76% | 0.82% | 1.90% | 2.47% | 2.99% | 1.09% | 1.83% |
VRIG Invesco Variable Rate Investment Grade ETF | 4.71% | 4.99% | 6.09% | 5.97% | 2.39% | 0.78% | 1.57% | 3.12% | 2.89% | 2.31% | 0.60% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RINF and VRIG have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RINF has higher volatility (1.55%) compared to VRIG (0.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RINF dropped -43.51% vs VRIG's -13.04%.
On 5-year performance, RINF leads with 4.84% vs 4.49% for VRIG. Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. On volatility, VRIG has been the lower-risk option at 0.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RINF has performed better with a 4.84% return vs 4.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RINF and VRIG have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.
VRIG has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 3.79% for RINF.
RINF is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while VRIG is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Invesco.
VRIG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.08 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RINF and VRIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer